These provides some info about the SoC (though it's still somewhat
incomplete and needs more work, see comments).
There's also a control register for selecting DRAM vs. BRAM at 0
(and for soft-resetting the SoC but that isn't wired up yet).
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
An external signal can control whether the core will start
executing at the standard or the alternate reset address.
This will be used when litedram is initialized by microwatt
itself, to route the reset to the built-in init code secondary
block RAM.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Micropython has been able to fit into 384kB for ages, so lets reduce our
simulated RAM. This is useful for testing if micropython will run on an
ECP5 85k, which has enough BRAM for 384kB but not enough for 512kB.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@linux.ibm.com>
This replaces the simple_ram_behavioural and mw_soc_memory modules
with a common wishbone_bram_wrapper.vhdl that interfaces the
pipelined WB with a lower-level RAM module, along with an FPGA
and a sim variants of the latter.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This module adds some simple core controls:
reset, stop, start, step
along with icache clear and reading the NIA and core
status bits
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org
Mikey points out that our stack grows down from 512kB and our
heap is below that too, so we can reduce our BRAM requirements,
which allowing some smaller FPGA boards to work. Not sure why
I thought we were using memory between 512kB and 1MB.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@linux.ibm.com>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt