You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
microwatt/execute1.vhdl

1853 lines
68 KiB
VHDL

library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
library work;
use work.decode_types.all;
use work.common.all;
use work.helpers.all;
use work.crhelpers.all;
use work.insn_helpers.all;
use work.ppc_fx_insns.all;
entity execute1 is
generic (
SIM : boolean := false;
EX1_BYPASS : boolean := true;
HAS_FPU : boolean := true;
-- Non-zero to enable log data collection
LOG_LENGTH : natural := 0
);
port (
clk : in std_ulogic;
rst : in std_ulogic;
-- asynchronous
flush_in : in std_ulogic;
busy_out : out std_ulogic;
e_in : in Decode2ToExecute1Type;
l_in : in Loadstore1ToExecute1Type;
fp_in : in FPUToExecute1Type;
ext_irq_in : std_ulogic;
interrupt_in : WritebackToExecute1Type;
-- asynchronous
l_out : out Execute1ToLoadstore1Type;
fp_out : out Execute1ToFPUType;
e_out : out Execute1ToWritebackType;
bypass_data : out bypass_data_t;
bypass_cr_data : out cr_bypass_data_t;
bypass2_data : out bypass_data_t;
bypass2_cr_data : out cr_bypass_data_t;
dbg_ctrl_out : out ctrl_t;
icache_inval : out std_ulogic;
terminate_out : out std_ulogic;
-- PMU event buses
wb_events : in WritebackEventType;
ls_events : in Loadstore1EventType;
dc_events : in DcacheEventType;
ic_events : in IcacheEventType;
-- Access to SPRs from core_debug module
dbg_spr_req : in std_ulogic;
dbg_spr_ack : out std_ulogic;
dbg_spr_addr : in std_ulogic_vector(7 downto 0);
dbg_spr_data : out std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
-- debug
sim_dump : in std_ulogic;
sim_dump_done : out std_ulogic;
log_out : out std_ulogic_vector(11 downto 0);
log_rd_addr : out std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
log_rd_data : in std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
log_wr_addr : in std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0)
);
end entity execute1;
architecture behaviour of execute1 is
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
type side_effect_type is record
terminate : std_ulogic;
icache_inval : std_ulogic;
write_msr : std_ulogic;
write_xerlow : std_ulogic;
write_dec : std_ulogic;
write_cfar : std_ulogic;
write_loga : std_ulogic;
inc_loga : std_ulogic;
write_pmuspr : std_ulogic;
ramspr_write_even : std_ulogic;
ramspr_write_odd : std_ulogic;
mult_32s : std_ulogic;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
end record;
constant side_effect_init : side_effect_type := (others => '0');
type actions_type is record
e : Execute1ToWritebackType;
se : side_effect_type;
complete : std_ulogic;
exception : std_ulogic;
trap : std_ulogic;
advance_nia : std_ulogic;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
new_msr : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
take_branch : std_ulogic;
direct_branch : std_ulogic;
start_mul : std_ulogic;
start_div : std_ulogic;
do_trace : std_ulogic;
fp_intr : std_ulogic;
res2_sel : std_ulogic_vector(1 downto 0);
bypass_valid : std_ulogic;
ramspr_odd_data : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
end record;
constant actions_type_init : actions_type :=
(e => Execute1ToWritebackInit, se => side_effect_init,
new_msr => (others => '0'), res2_sel => "00",
ramspr_odd_data => 64x"0", others => '0');
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
type reg_stage1_type is record
e : Execute1ToWritebackType;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
se : side_effect_type;
busy: std_ulogic;
fp_exception_next : std_ulogic;
trace_next : std_ulogic;
prev_op : insn_type_t;
oe : std_ulogic;
mul_select : std_ulogic_vector(1 downto 0);
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
res2_sel : std_ulogic_vector(1 downto 0);
spr_select : spr_id;
pmu_spr_num : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
mul_in_progress : std_ulogic;
mul_finish : std_ulogic;
div_in_progress : std_ulogic;
no_instr_avail : std_ulogic;
instr_dispatch : std_ulogic;
ext_interrupt : std_ulogic;
taken_branch_event : std_ulogic;
br_mispredict : std_ulogic;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
msr : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
xerc : xer_common_t;
xerc_valid : std_ulogic;
ramspr_wraddr : ramspr_index;
ramspr_odd_data : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
end record;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
constant reg_stage1_type_init : reg_stage1_type :=
(e => Execute1ToWritebackInit, se => side_effect_init,
busy => '0',
fp_exception_next => '0', trace_next => '0', prev_op => OP_ILLEGAL,
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
oe => '0', mul_select => "00", res2_sel => "00",
spr_select => spr_id_init, pmu_spr_num => 5x"0",
mul_in_progress => '0', mul_finish => '0', div_in_progress => '0',
no_instr_avail => '0', instr_dispatch => '0', ext_interrupt => '0',
taken_branch_event => '0', br_mispredict => '0',
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
msr => 64x"0",
xerc => xerc_init, xerc_valid => '0',
ramspr_wraddr => (others => '0'), ramspr_odd_data => 64x"0");
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
type reg_stage2_type is record
e : Execute1ToWritebackType;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
se : side_effect_type;
ext_interrupt : std_ulogic;
taken_branch_event : std_ulogic;
br_mispredict : std_ulogic;
log_addr_spr : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
end record;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
constant reg_stage2_type_init : reg_stage2_type :=
(e => Execute1ToWritebackInit, se => side_effect_init,
log_addr_spr => 32x"0", others => '0');
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
signal ex1, ex1in : reg_stage1_type;
signal ex2, ex2in : reg_stage2_type;
signal actions : actions_type;
signal a_in, b_in, c_in : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal cr_in : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
signal xerc_in : xer_common_t;
signal mshort_p : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0) := (others => '0');
signal valid_in : std_ulogic;
signal ctrl: ctrl_t := ctrl_t_init;
signal ctrl_tmp: ctrl_t := ctrl_t_init;
signal right_shift, rot_clear_left, rot_clear_right: std_ulogic;
signal rot_sign_ext: std_ulogic;
signal rotator_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal rotator_carry: std_ulogic;
signal logical_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal do_popcnt: std_ulogic;
signal countbits_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal alu_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal adder_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal misc_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal muldiv_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal shortmul_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal spr_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal next_nia : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
signal s1_sel : std_ulogic_vector(2 downto 0);
signal carry_32 : std_ulogic;
signal carry_64 : std_ulogic;
signal overflow_32 : std_ulogic;
signal overflow_64 : std_ulogic;
signal trapval : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
signal write_cr_mask : std_ulogic_vector(7 downto 0);
signal write_cr_data : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
-- multiply signals
signal x_to_multiply: MultiplyInputType;
signal multiply_to_x: MultiplyOutputType;
signal x_to_mult_32s: MultiplyInputType;
signal mult_32s_to_x: MultiplyOutputType;
-- divider signals
signal x_to_divider: Execute1ToDividerType;
signal divider_to_x: DividerToExecute1Type := DividerToExecute1Init;
-- random number generator signals
signal random_raw : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal random_cond : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal random_err : std_ulogic;
-- PMU signals
signal x_to_pmu : Execute1ToPMUType;
signal pmu_to_x : PMUToExecute1Type;
-- signals for logging
signal exception_log : std_ulogic;
signal irq_valid_log : std_ulogic;
-- SPR-related signals
type ramspr_half_t is array(ramspr_index_range) of std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal even_sprs : ramspr_half_t := (others => (others => '0'));
signal odd_sprs : ramspr_half_t := (others => (others => '0'));
signal ramspr_even : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal ramspr_odd : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal ramspr_result : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal ramspr_rd_odd : std_ulogic;
signal ramspr_wr_addr : ramspr_index;
signal ramspr_even_wr_data : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal ramspr_even_wr_enab : std_ulogic;
signal ramspr_odd_wr_data : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal ramspr_odd_wr_enab : std_ulogic;
signal stage2_stall : std_ulogic;
type privilege_level is (USER, SUPER);
type op_privilege_array is array(insn_type_t) of privilege_level;
constant op_privilege: op_privilege_array := (
OP_ATTN => SUPER,
OP_MFMSR => SUPER,
OP_MTMSRD => SUPER,
OP_RFID => SUPER,
dcache: Implement data TLB This adds a TLB to dcache, providing the ability to translate addresses for loads and stores. No protection mechanism has been implemented yet. The MSR_DR bit controls whether addresses are translated through the TLB. The TLB is a fixed-pagesize, set-associative cache. Currently the page size is 4kB and the TLB is 2-way set associative with 64 entries per set. This implements the tlbie instruction. RB bits 10 and 11 control whether the whole TLB is invalidated (if either bit is 1) or just a single entry corresponding to the effective page number in bits 12-63 of RB. As an extension until we get a hardware page table walk, a tlbie instruction with RB bits 9-11 set to 001 will load an entry into the TLB. The TLB entry value is in RS in the format of a radix PTE. Currently there is no proper handling of TLB misses. The load or store will not be performed but no interrupt is generated. In order to make timing at 100MHz on the Arty A7-100, we compare the real address from each way of the TLB with the tag from each way of the cache in parallel (requiring # TLB ways * # cache ways comparators). Then the result is selected based on which way hit in the TLB. That avoids a timing path going through the TLB EA comparators, the multiplexer that selects the RA, and the cache tag comparators. The hack where addresses of the form 0xc------- are marked as cache-inhibited is kept for now but restricted to real-mode accesses. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
OP_TLBIE => SUPER,
others => USER
);
function instr_is_privileged(op: insn_type_t; insn: std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0))
return boolean is
begin
if op_privilege(op) = SUPER then
return true;
elsif op = OP_MFSPR or op = OP_MTSPR then
return insn(20) = '1';
else
return false;
end if;
end;
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
procedure set_carry(e: inout Execute1ToWritebackType;
carry32 : in std_ulogic;
carry : in std_ulogic) is
begin
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
e.xerc.ca32 := carry32;
e.xerc.ca := carry;
end;
procedure set_ov(e: inout Execute1ToWritebackType;
ov : in std_ulogic;
ov32 : in std_ulogic) is
begin
e.xerc.ov32 := ov32;
e.xerc.ov := ov;
if ov = '1' then
e.xerc.so := '1';
end if;
end;
function calc_ov(msb_a : std_ulogic; msb_b: std_ulogic;
ca: std_ulogic; msb_r: std_ulogic) return std_ulogic is
begin
return (ca xor msb_r) and not (msb_a xor msb_b);
end;
function decode_input_carry(ic : carry_in_t;
xerc : xer_common_t) return std_ulogic is
begin
case ic is
when ZERO =>
return '0';
when CA =>
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
return xerc.ca;
when OV =>
return xerc.ov;
when ONE =>
return '1';
end case;
end;
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
function msr_copy(msr: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0))
return std_ulogic_vector is
variable msr_out: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
begin
-- ISA says this:
-- Defined MSR bits are classified as either full func-
-- tion or partial function. Full function MSR bits are
-- saved in SRR1 or HSRR1 when an interrupt other
-- than a System Call Vectored interrupt occurs and
-- restored by rfscv, rfid, or hrfid, while partial func-
-- tion MSR bits are not saved or restored.
-- Full function MSR bits lie in the range 0:32, 37:41, and
-- 48:63, and partial function MSR bits lie in the range
-- 33:36 and 42:47. (Note this is IBM bit numbering).
msr_out := (others => '0');
msr_out(63 downto 31) := msr(63 downto 31);
msr_out(26 downto 22) := msr(26 downto 22);
msr_out(15 downto 0) := msr(15 downto 0);
return msr_out;
end;
function intr_srr1(msr: std_ulogic_vector; flags: std_ulogic_vector)
return std_ulogic_vector is
variable srr1: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
begin
srr1(63 downto 31) := msr(63 downto 31);
srr1(30 downto 27) := flags(14 downto 11);
srr1(26 downto 22) := msr(26 downto 22);
srr1(21 downto 16) := flags(5 downto 0);
srr1(15 downto 0) := msr(15 downto 0);
return srr1;
end;
-- Work out whether a signed value fits into n bits,
-- that is, see if it is in the range -2^(n-1) .. 2^(n-1) - 1
function fits_in_n_bits(val: std_ulogic_vector; n: integer) return boolean is
variable x, xp1: std_ulogic_vector(val'left downto val'right);
begin
x := val;
if val(val'left) = '0' then
x := not val;
end if;
xp1 := bit_reverse(std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(bit_reverse(x)) + 1));
x := x and not xp1;
-- For positive inputs, x has ones at the positions
-- to the left of the leftmost 1 bit in val.
-- For negative inputs, x has ones to the left of
-- the leftmost 0 bit in val.
return x(n - 1) = '1';
end;
function assemble_xer(xerc: xer_common_t; xer_low: std_ulogic_vector)
return std_ulogic_vector is
begin
return 32x"0" & xerc.so & xerc.ov & xerc.ca & "000000000" &
xerc.ov32 & xerc.ca32 & xer_low(17 downto 0);
end;
-- Tell vivado to keep the hierarchy for the random module so that the
-- net names in the xdc file match.
attribute keep_hierarchy : string;
attribute keep_hierarchy of random_0 : label is "yes";
begin
rotator_0: entity work.rotator
port map (
rs => c_in,
ra => a_in,
shift => b_in(6 downto 0),
insn => e_in.insn,
is_32bit => e_in.is_32bit,
right_shift => right_shift,
arith => e_in.is_signed,
clear_left => rot_clear_left,
clear_right => rot_clear_right,
sign_ext_rs => rot_sign_ext,
result => rotator_result,
carry_out => rotator_carry
);
logical_0: entity work.logical
port map (
rs => c_in,
rb => b_in,
op => e_in.insn_type,
invert_in => e_in.invert_a,
invert_out => e_in.invert_out,
result => logical_result,
datalen => e_in.data_len
);
countbits_0: entity work.bit_counter
port map (
clk => clk,
rs => c_in,
stall => stage2_stall,
count_right => e_in.insn(10),
is_32bit => e_in.is_32bit,
do_popcnt => do_popcnt,
datalen => e_in.data_len,
result => countbits_result
);
multiply_0: entity work.multiply
port map (
clk => clk,
m_in => x_to_multiply,
m_out => multiply_to_x
);
mult_32s_0: entity work.multiply_32s
port map (
clk => clk,
stall => stage2_stall,
m_in => x_to_mult_32s,
m_out => mult_32s_to_x
);
divider_0: if not HAS_FPU generate
div_0: entity work.divider
port map (
clk => clk,
rst => rst,
d_in => x_to_divider,
d_out => divider_to_x
);
end generate;
random_0: entity work.random
port map (
clk => clk,
data => random_cond,
raw => random_raw,
err => random_err
);
pmu_0: entity work.pmu
port map (
clk => clk,
rst => rst,
p_in => x_to_pmu,
p_out => pmu_to_x
);
dbg_ctrl_out <= ctrl;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
log_rd_addr <= ex2.log_addr_spr;
a_in <= e_in.read_data1;
b_in <= e_in.read_data2;
c_in <= e_in.read_data3;
cr_in <= e_in.cr;
x_to_pmu.occur <= (instr_complete => wb_events.instr_complete,
fp_complete => wb_events.fp_complete,
ld_complete => ls_events.load_complete,
st_complete => ls_events.store_complete,
itlb_miss => ls_events.itlb_miss,
dc_load_miss => dc_events.load_miss,
dc_ld_miss_resolved => dc_events.dcache_refill,
dc_store_miss => dc_events.store_miss,
dtlb_miss => dc_events.dtlb_miss,
dtlb_miss_resolved => dc_events.dtlb_miss_resolved,
icache_miss => ic_events.icache_miss,
itlb_miss_resolved => ic_events.itlb_miss_resolved,
no_instr_avail => ex1.no_instr_avail,
dispatch => ex1.instr_dispatch,
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
ext_interrupt => ex2.ext_interrupt,
br_taken_complete => ex2.taken_branch_event,
br_mispredict => ex2.br_mispredict,
others => '0');
x_to_pmu.nia <= e_in.nia;
x_to_pmu.addr <= (others => '0');
x_to_pmu.addr_v <= '0';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
x_to_pmu.spr_num <= ex1.pmu_spr_num;
x_to_pmu.spr_val <= ex1.e.write_data;
x_to_pmu.run <= '1';
-- XER forwarding. The CA and CA32 bits are only modified by instructions
-- that are handled here, so for them we can just use the result most
-- recently sent to writeback, unless a pipeline flush has happened in the
-- meantime.
-- Hazards for SO/OV/OV32 are handled by control.vhdl as there may be other
-- units writing to them. No forwarding is done because performance of
-- instructions that alter them is not considered significant.
xerc_in.so <= e_in.xerc.so;
xerc_in.ov <= e_in.xerc.ov;
xerc_in.ov32 <= e_in.xerc.ov32;
xerc_in.ca <= ex1.xerc.ca when ex1.xerc_valid = '1' else e_in.xerc.ca;
xerc_in.ca32 <= ex1.xerc.ca32 when ex1.xerc_valid = '1' else e_in.xerc.ca32;
-- N.B. the busy signal from each source includes the
-- stage2 stall from that source in it.
busy_out <= l_in.busy or ex1.busy or fp_in.busy;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
valid_in <= e_in.valid and not (busy_out or flush_in or ex1.e.redirect or ex1.e.interrupt);
-- SPRs stored in two small RAM arrays (two so that we can read and write
-- two SPRs in each cycle).
ramspr_read: process(all)
variable even_rd_data, odd_rd_data : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable wr_addr : ramspr_index;
variable even_wr_enab, odd_wr_enab : std_ulogic;
variable even_wr_data, odd_wr_data : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable doit : std_ulogic;
begin
-- Read address mux and async RAM reading
if is_X(e_in.ramspr_even_rdaddr) then
even_rd_data := (others => 'X');
else
even_rd_data := even_sprs(to_integer(e_in.ramspr_even_rdaddr));
end if;
if is_X(e_in.ramspr_even_rdaddr) then
odd_rd_data := (others => 'X');
else
odd_rd_data := odd_sprs(to_integer(e_in.ramspr_odd_rdaddr));
end if;
-- Write address and data muxes
doit := ex1.e.valid and not stage2_stall and not flush_in;
even_wr_enab := (ex1.se.ramspr_write_even and doit) or interrupt_in.intr;
odd_wr_enab := (ex1.se.ramspr_write_odd and doit) or interrupt_in.intr;
if interrupt_in.intr = '1' then
wr_addr := RAMSPR_SRR0;
else
wr_addr := ex1.ramspr_wraddr;
end if;
if interrupt_in.intr = '1' then
even_wr_data := ex2.e.last_nia;
odd_wr_data := intr_srr1(ctrl.msr, interrupt_in.srr1);
else
even_wr_data := ex1.e.write_data;
odd_wr_data := ex1.ramspr_odd_data;
end if;
ramspr_wr_addr <= wr_addr;
ramspr_even_wr_data <= even_wr_data;
ramspr_even_wr_enab <= even_wr_enab;
ramspr_odd_wr_data <= odd_wr_data;
ramspr_odd_wr_enab <= odd_wr_enab;
-- SPR RAM read with write data bypass
-- We assume no instruction executes in the cycle immediately following
-- an interrupt, so we don't need to bypass interrupt data
if ex1.se.ramspr_write_even = '1' and e_in.ramspr_even_rdaddr = ex1.ramspr_wraddr then
ramspr_even <= ex1.e.write_data;
else
ramspr_even <= even_rd_data;
end if;
if ex1.se.ramspr_write_odd = '1' and e_in.ramspr_odd_rdaddr = ex1.ramspr_wraddr then
ramspr_odd <= ex1.ramspr_odd_data;
else
ramspr_odd <= odd_rd_data;
end if;
if e_in.ramspr_rd_odd = '0' then
ramspr_result <= ramspr_even;
else
ramspr_result <= ramspr_odd;
end if;
end process;
ramspr_write: process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if ramspr_even_wr_enab = '1' then
assert not is_X(ramspr_wr_addr) report "Writing to unknown address" severity FAILURE;
even_sprs(to_integer(ramspr_wr_addr)) <= ramspr_even_wr_data;
report "writing even spr " & integer'image(to_integer(ramspr_wr_addr)) & " data=" &
to_hstring(ramspr_even_wr_data);
end if;
if ramspr_odd_wr_enab = '1' then
assert not is_X(ramspr_wr_addr) report "Writing to unknown address" severity FAILURE;
odd_sprs(to_integer(ramspr_wr_addr)) <= ramspr_odd_wr_data;
report "writing odd spr " & integer'image(to_integer(ramspr_wr_addr)) & " data=" &
to_hstring(ramspr_odd_wr_data);
end if;
end if;
end process;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
-- First stage result mux
s1_sel <= e_in.result_sel when ex1.busy = '0' else "100";
with s1_sel select alu_result <=
adder_result when "000",
logical_result when "001",
rotator_result when "010",
shortmul_result when "011",
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
muldiv_result when "100",
ramspr_result when "101",
next_nia when "110",
misc_result when others;
execute1_0: process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if rst = '1' then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
ex1 <= reg_stage1_type_init;
ex2 <= reg_stage2_type_init;
ctrl <= ctrl_t_init;
ctrl.msr <= (MSR_SF => '1', MSR_LE => '1', others => '0');
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
ex1.msr <= (MSR_SF => '1', MSR_LE => '1', others => '0');
else
ex1 <= ex1in;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
ex2 <= ex2in;
ctrl <= ctrl_tmp;
if valid_in = '1' then
report "execute " & to_hstring(e_in.nia) & " op=" & insn_type_t'image(e_in.insn_type) &
" wr=" & to_hstring(ex1in.e.write_reg) & " we=" & std_ulogic'image(ex1in.e.write_enable) &
" tag=" & integer'image(ex1in.e.instr_tag.tag) & std_ulogic'image(ex1in.e.instr_tag.valid);
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
-- We mustn't get stalled on a cycle where execute2 is
-- completing an instruction or generating an interrupt
if ex2.e.valid = '1' or ex2.e.interrupt = '1' then
assert stage2_stall = '0' severity failure;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
end if;
end if;
end if;
end process;
ex_dbg_spr: process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if rst = '0' and dbg_spr_req = '1' then
if e_in.dbg_spr_access = '1' and dbg_spr_ack = '0' then
if dbg_spr_addr(7) = '1' then
dbg_spr_data <= ramspr_result;
else
dbg_spr_data <= assemble_xer(xerc_in, ctrl.xer_low);
end if;
dbg_spr_ack <= '1';
end if;
else
dbg_spr_ack <= '0';
end if;
end if;
end process;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
-- Data path for integer instructions (first execute stage)
execute1_dp: process(all)
variable a_inv : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable sum_with_carry : std_ulogic_vector(64 downto 0);
variable sign1, sign2 : std_ulogic;
variable abs1, abs2 : signed(63 downto 0);
variable addend : std_ulogic_vector(127 downto 0);
variable addg6s : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable crbit : integer range 0 to 31;
variable isel_result : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable darn : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable setb_result : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable mfcr_result : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable lo, hi : integer;
variable l : std_ulogic;
variable zerohi, zerolo : std_ulogic;
variable msb_a, msb_b : std_ulogic;
variable a_lt : std_ulogic;
variable a_lt_lo : std_ulogic;
variable a_lt_hi : std_ulogic;
variable newcrf : std_ulogic_vector(3 downto 0);
variable bf, bfa : std_ulogic_vector(2 downto 0);
variable crnum : crnum_t;
variable scrnum : crnum_t;
variable cr_operands : std_ulogic_vector(1 downto 0);
variable crresult : std_ulogic;
variable bt, ba, bb : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
variable btnum : integer range 0 to 3;
variable banum, bbnum : integer range 0 to 31;
variable j : integer;
begin
-- Main adder
if e_in.invert_a = '0' then
a_inv := a_in;
else
a_inv := not a_in;
end if;
sum_with_carry := ppc_adde(a_inv, b_in,
decode_input_carry(e_in.input_carry, xerc_in));
adder_result <= sum_with_carry(63 downto 0);
carry_32 <= sum_with_carry(32) xor a_inv(32) xor b_in(32);
carry_64 <= sum_with_carry(64);
overflow_32 <= calc_ov(a_inv(31), b_in(31), carry_32, sum_with_carry(31));
overflow_64 <= calc_ov(a_inv(63), b_in(63), carry_64, sum_with_carry(63));
-- signals to multiplier
addend := (others => '0');
if e_in.reg_valid3 = '1' then
-- integer multiply-add, major op 4 (if it is a multiply)
addend(63 downto 0) := c_in;
if e_in.is_signed = '1' then
addend(127 downto 64) := (others => c_in(63));
end if;
end if;
x_to_multiply.data1 <= std_ulogic_vector(a_in);
x_to_multiply.data2 <= std_ulogic_vector(b_in);
x_to_multiply.is_signed <= e_in.is_signed;
x_to_multiply.subtract <= '0';
x_to_multiply.addend <= addend;
-- Interface to divide unit
if not HAS_FPU then
sign1 := '0';
sign2 := '0';
if e_in.is_signed = '1' then
if e_in.is_32bit = '1' then
sign1 := a_in(31);
sign2 := b_in(31);
else
sign1 := a_in(63);
sign2 := b_in(63);
end if;
end if;
-- take absolute values
if sign1 = '0' then
abs1 := signed(a_in);
else
abs1 := - signed(a_in);
end if;
if sign2 = '0' then
abs2 := signed(b_in);
else
abs2 := - signed(b_in);
end if;
x_to_divider.is_signed <= e_in.is_signed;
x_to_divider.is_32bit <= e_in.is_32bit;
x_to_divider.is_extended <= '0';
x_to_divider.is_modulus <= '0';
if e_in.insn_type = OP_MOD then
x_to_divider.is_modulus <= '1';
end if;
x_to_divider.flush <= flush_in;
x_to_divider.neg_result <= sign1 xor (sign2 and not x_to_divider.is_modulus);
if e_in.is_32bit = '0' then
-- 64-bit forms
if e_in.insn_type = OP_DIVE then
x_to_divider.is_extended <= '1';
end if;
x_to_divider.dividend <= std_ulogic_vector(abs1);
x_to_divider.divisor <= std_ulogic_vector(abs2);
else
-- 32-bit forms
x_to_divider.is_extended <= '0';
if e_in.insn_type = OP_DIVE then -- extended forms
x_to_divider.dividend <= std_ulogic_vector(abs1(31 downto 0)) & x"00000000";
else
x_to_divider.dividend <= x"00000000" & std_ulogic_vector(abs1(31 downto 0));
end if;
x_to_divider.divisor <= x"00000000" & std_ulogic_vector(abs2(31 downto 0));
end if;
end if;
-- signals to 32-bit multiplier
x_to_mult_32s.data1 <= 32x"0" & a_in(31 downto 0);
x_to_mult_32s.data2 <= 32x"0" & b_in(31 downto 0);
x_to_mult_32s.is_signed <= e_in.is_signed;
-- The following are unused, but set here to avoid X states
x_to_mult_32s.subtract <= '0';
x_to_mult_32s.addend <= (others => '0');
shortmul_result <= std_ulogic_vector(resize(signed(mshort_p), 64));
case ex1.mul_select is
when "00" =>
muldiv_result <= multiply_to_x.result(63 downto 0);
when "01" =>
muldiv_result <= multiply_to_x.result(127 downto 64);
when "10" =>
muldiv_result <= multiply_to_x.result(63 downto 32) &
multiply_to_x.result(63 downto 32);
when others =>
muldiv_result <= divider_to_x.write_reg_data;
end case;
-- Compute misc_result
case e_in.sub_select is
when "000" =>
misc_result <= (others => '0');
when "001" =>
-- addg6s
addg6s := (others => '0');
for i in 0 to 14 loop
lo := i * 4;
hi := (i + 1) * 4;
if (a_in(hi) xor b_in(hi) xor sum_with_carry(hi)) = '0' then
addg6s(lo + 3 downto lo) := "0110";
end if;
end loop;
if sum_with_carry(64) = '0' then
addg6s(63 downto 60) := "0110";
end if;
misc_result <= addg6s;
when "010" =>
-- isel
crbit := to_integer(unsigned(insn_bc(e_in.insn)));
if cr_in(31-crbit) = '1' then
isel_result := a_in;
else
isel_result := b_in;
end if;
misc_result <= isel_result;
when "011" =>
-- darn
darn := (others => '1');
if random_err = '0' then
case e_in.insn(17 downto 16) is
when "00" =>
darn := x"00000000" & random_cond(31 downto 0);
when "10" =>
darn := random_raw;
when others =>
darn := random_cond;
end case;
end if;
misc_result <= darn;
when "100" =>
-- mfmsr
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
misc_result <= ex1.msr;
when "101" =>
if e_in.insn(20) = '0' then
-- mfcr
mfcr_result := x"00000000" & cr_in;
else
-- mfocrf
crnum := fxm_to_num(insn_fxm(e_in.insn));
mfcr_result := (others => '0');
for i in 0 to 7 loop
lo := (7-i)*4;
hi := lo + 3;
if crnum = i then
mfcr_result(hi downto lo) := cr_in(hi downto lo);
end if;
end loop;
end if;
misc_result <= mfcr_result;
when "110" =>
-- setb
bfa := insn_bfa(e_in.insn);
crbit := to_integer(unsigned(bfa)) * 4;
setb_result := (others => '0');
if cr_in(31 - crbit) = '1' then
setb_result := (others => '1');
elsif cr_in(30 - crbit) = '1' then
setb_result(0) := '1';
end if;
misc_result <= setb_result;
when others =>
misc_result <= (others => '0');
end case;
-- compute comparison results
-- Note, we have done RB - RA, not RA - RB
if e_in.insn_type = OP_CMP then
l := insn_l(e_in.insn);
else
l := not e_in.is_32bit;
end if;
zerolo := not (or (a_in(31 downto 0) xor b_in(31 downto 0)));
zerohi := not (or (a_in(63 downto 32) xor b_in(63 downto 32)));
if zerolo = '1' and (l = '0' or zerohi = '1') then
-- values are equal
trapval <= "00100";
else
a_lt_lo := '0';
a_lt_hi := '0';
if is_X(a_in) or is_X(b_in) then
a_lt_lo := 'X';
a_lt_hi := 'X';
else
if unsigned(a_in(30 downto 0)) < unsigned(b_in(30 downto 0)) then
a_lt_lo := '1';
end if;
if unsigned(a_in(62 downto 31)) < unsigned(b_in(62 downto 31)) then
a_lt_hi := '1';
end if;
end if;
if l = '1' then
-- 64-bit comparison
msb_a := a_in(63);
msb_b := b_in(63);
a_lt := a_lt_hi or (zerohi and (a_in(31) xnor b_in(31)) and a_lt_lo);
else
-- 32-bit comparison
msb_a := a_in(31);
msb_b := b_in(31);
a_lt := a_lt_lo;
end if;
if msb_a /= msb_b then
-- Comparison is clear from MSB difference.
-- for signed, 0 is greater; for unsigned, 1 is greater
trapval <= msb_a & msb_b & '0' & msb_b & msb_a;
else
-- MSBs are equal, so signed and unsigned comparisons give the
-- same answer.
trapval <= a_lt & not a_lt & '0' & a_lt & not a_lt;
end if;
end if;
-- CR result mux
bf := insn_bf(e_in.insn);
newcrf := (others => '0');
case e_in.sub_select is
when "000" =>
-- CMP and CMPL instructions
if e_in.is_signed = '1' then
newcrf := trapval(4 downto 2) & xerc_in.so;
else
newcrf := trapval(1 downto 0) & trapval(2) & xerc_in.so;
end if;
when "001" =>
newcrf := ppc_cmprb(a_in, b_in, insn_l(e_in.insn));
when "010" =>
newcrf := ppc_cmpeqb(a_in, b_in);
when "011" =>
if is_X(e_in.insn) then
newcrf := (others => 'X');
elsif e_in.insn(1) = '1' then
-- CR logical instructions
crnum := to_integer(unsigned(bf));
j := (7 - crnum) * 4;
newcrf := cr_in(j + 3 downto j);
bt := insn_bt(e_in.insn);
ba := insn_ba(e_in.insn);
bb := insn_bb(e_in.insn);
btnum := 3 - to_integer(unsigned(bt(1 downto 0)));
banum := 31 - to_integer(unsigned(ba));
bbnum := 31 - to_integer(unsigned(bb));
-- Bits 6-9 of the instruction word give the truth table
-- of the requested logical operation
cr_operands := cr_in(banum) & cr_in(bbnum);
crresult := e_in.insn(6 + to_integer(unsigned(cr_operands)));
for i in 0 to 3 loop
if i = btnum then
newcrf(i) := crresult;
end if;
end loop;
else
-- MCRF
bfa := insn_bfa(e_in.insn);
scrnum := to_integer(unsigned(bfa));
j := (7 - scrnum) * 4;
newcrf := cr_in(j + 3 downto j);
end if;
when "100" =>
-- MCRXRX
newcrf := xerc_in.ov & xerc_in.ov32 & xerc_in.ca & xerc_in.ca32;
when others =>
end case;
if e_in.insn_type = OP_MTCRF then
if e_in.insn(20) = '0' then
-- mtcrf
write_cr_mask <= insn_fxm(e_in.insn);
else
-- mtocrf: We require one hot priority encoding here
crnum := fxm_to_num(insn_fxm(e_in.insn));
write_cr_mask <= num_to_fxm(crnum);
end if;
elsif e_in.output_cr = '1' and not is_X(bf) then
crnum := to_integer(unsigned(bf));
write_cr_mask <= num_to_fxm(crnum);
else
write_cr_mask <= (others => '0');
end if;
for i in 0 to 7 loop
if write_cr_mask(i) = '0' then
write_cr_data(i*4 + 3 downto i*4) <= cr_in(i*4 + 3 downto i*4);
elsif e_in.insn_type = OP_MTCRF then
write_cr_data(i*4 + 3 downto i*4) <= c_in(i*4 + 3 downto i*4);
else
write_cr_data(i*4 + 3 downto i*4) <= newcrf;
end if;
end loop;
end process;
execute1_actions: process(all)
variable v: actions_type;
variable bo, bi : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
variable illegal : std_ulogic;
variable privileged : std_ulogic;
variable slow_op : std_ulogic;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
variable owait : std_ulogic;
variable srr1 : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
begin
v := actions_type_init;
v.e.write_data := alu_result;
v.e.write_reg := e_in.write_reg;
v.e.write_enable := e_in.write_reg_enable;
v.e.rc := e_in.rc;
v.e.write_cr_data := write_cr_data;
v.e.write_cr_mask := write_cr_mask;
v.e.write_cr_enable := e_in.output_cr;
v.e.write_xerc_enable := e_in.output_xer;
v.e.xerc := xerc_in;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.new_msr := ex1.msr;
v.e.redir_mode := ex1.msr(MSR_IR) & not ex1.msr(MSR_PR) &
not ex1.msr(MSR_LE) & not ex1.msr(MSR_SF);
v.e.intr_vec := 16#700#;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.e.mode_32bit := not ex1.msr(MSR_SF);
v.e.instr_tag := e_in.instr_tag;
v.e.last_nia := e_in.nia;
v.e.br_offset := 64x"4";
v.se.ramspr_write_even := e_in.ramspr_write_even;
v.se.ramspr_write_odd := e_in.ramspr_write_odd;
v.ramspr_odd_data := c_in;
if e_in.dec_ctr = '1' then
v.ramspr_odd_data := std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(ramspr_odd) - 1);
end if;
-- Note the difference between v.exception and v.trap:
-- v.exception signals a condition that prevents execution of the
-- instruction, and hence shouldn't depend on operand data, so as to
-- avoid timing chains through both data and control paths.
-- v.trap also means we want to generate an interrupt, but doesn't
-- cancel instruction execution (hence we need to avoid setting any
-- side-effect flags or write enables when generating a trap).
-- With v.trap = 1 we will assert both ex1.e.valid and ex1.e.interrupt
-- to writeback, and it will complete the instruction and take
-- and interrupt. It is OK for v.trap to depend on operand data.
illegal := '0';
privileged := '0';
slow_op := '0';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
owait := '0';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if ex1.msr(MSR_PR) = '1' and instr_is_privileged(e_in.insn_type, e_in.insn) then
privileged := '1';
end if;
if (not HAS_FPU and e_in.fac = FPU) or e_in.unit = NONE then
-- make lfd/stfd/lfs/stfs etc. illegal in no-FPU implementations
illegal := '1';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.do_trace := ex1.msr(MSR_SE);
case_0: case e_in.insn_type is
when OP_ILLEGAL =>
illegal := '1';
when OP_SC =>
-- check bit 1 of the instruction is 1 so we know this is sc;
-- 0 would mean scv, so generate an illegal instruction interrupt
if e_in.insn(1) = '1' then
v.trap := '1';
v.advance_nia := '1';
v.e.intr_vec := 16#C00#;
if e_in.valid = '1' then
report "sc";
end if;
else
illegal := '1';
end if;
when OP_ATTN =>
-- check bits 1-10 of the instruction to make sure it's attn
-- if not then it is illegal
if e_in.insn(10 downto 1) = "0100000000" then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.terminate := '1';
if e_in.valid = '1' then
report "ATTN";
end if;
else
illegal := '1';
end if;
when OP_NOP | OP_DCBF | OP_DCBST | OP_DCBT | OP_DCBTST | OP_ICBT =>
-- Do nothing
when OP_ADD =>
if e_in.output_carry = '1' then
if e_in.input_carry /= OV then
set_carry(v.e, carry_32, carry_64);
else
v.e.xerc.ov := carry_64;
v.e.xerc.ov32 := carry_32;
end if;
end if;
if e_in.oe = '1' then
set_ov(v.e, overflow_64, overflow_32);
end if;
when OP_CMP =>
when OP_TRAP =>
-- trap instructions (tw, twi, td, tdi)
v.e.intr_vec := 16#700#;
-- set bit 46 to say trap occurred
v.e.srr1(47 - 46) := '1';
if or (trapval and insn_to(e_in.insn)) = '1' then
-- generate trap-type program interrupt
v.trap := '1';
if e_in.valid = '1' then
report "trap";
end if;
end if;
when OP_ADDG6S =>
when OP_CMPRB =>
when OP_CMPEQB =>
when OP_AND | OP_OR | OP_XOR | OP_PRTY | OP_CMPB | OP_EXTS |
OP_BPERM | OP_BCD =>
when OP_B =>
v.take_branch := '1';
v.direct_branch := '1';
v.e.br_last := '1';
v.e.br_taken := '1';
v.e.br_offset := b_in;
v.e.abs_br := insn_aa(e_in.insn);
if e_in.br_pred = '0' then
-- should never happen
v.e.redirect := '1';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if ex1.msr(MSR_BE) = '1' then
v.do_trace := '1';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_cfar := '1';
when OP_BC =>
-- If CTR is being decremented, it is in ramspr_odd.
bo := insn_bo(e_in.insn);
bi := insn_bi(e_in.insn);
v.take_branch := ppc_bc_taken(bo, bi, cr_in, ramspr_odd);
if v.take_branch = '1' then
v.e.br_offset := b_in;
v.e.abs_br := insn_aa(e_in.insn);
end if;
-- Mispredicted branches cause a redirect
if v.take_branch /= e_in.br_pred then
v.e.redirect := '1';
end if;
v.direct_branch := '1';
v.e.br_last := '1';
v.e.br_taken := v.take_branch;
if ex1.msr(MSR_BE) = '1' then
v.do_trace := '1';
end if;
v.se.write_cfar := v.take_branch;
when OP_BCREG =>
-- If CTR is being decremented, it is in ramspr_odd.
-- The target address is in ramspr_result (LR, CTR or TAR).
bo := insn_bo(e_in.insn);
bi := insn_bi(e_in.insn);
v.take_branch := ppc_bc_taken(bo, bi, cr_in, ramspr_odd);
if v.take_branch = '1' then
v.e.br_offset := ramspr_result;
v.e.abs_br := '1';
end if;
-- Indirect branches are never predicted taken
v.e.redirect := v.take_branch;
v.e.br_taken := v.take_branch;
if ex1.msr(MSR_BE) = '1' then
v.do_trace := '1';
end if;
v.se.write_cfar := v.take_branch;
when OP_RFID =>
srr1 := ramspr_odd;
v.e.redir_mode := (srr1(MSR_IR) or srr1(MSR_PR)) & not srr1(MSR_PR) &
not srr1(MSR_LE) & not srr1(MSR_SF);
-- Can't use msr_copy here because the partial function MSR
-- bits should be left unchanged, not zeroed.
v.new_msr(63 downto 31) := srr1(63 downto 31);
v.new_msr(26 downto 22) := srr1(26 downto 22);
v.new_msr(15 downto 0) := srr1(15 downto 0);
if srr1(MSR_PR) = '1' then
v.new_msr(MSR_EE) := '1';
v.new_msr(MSR_IR) := '1';
v.new_msr(MSR_DR) := '1';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_msr := '1';
v.e.br_offset := ramspr_result;
v.e.abs_br := '1';
v.e.redirect := '1';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_cfar := '1';
if HAS_FPU then
v.fp_intr := fp_in.exception and
(srr1(MSR_FE0) or srr1(MSR_FE1));
end if;
v.do_trace := '0';
when OP_CNTZ | OP_POPCNT =>
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.res2_sel := "01";
slow_op := '1';
when OP_ISEL =>
when OP_CROP =>
when OP_MCRXRX =>
when OP_DARN =>
when OP_MFMSR =>
when OP_MFSPR =>
if e_in.spr_is_ram = '1' then
if e_in.valid = '1' and not is_X(e_in.insn) then
report "MFSPR to SPR " & integer'image(decode_spr_num(e_in.insn)) &
"=" & to_hstring(alu_result);
end if;
elsif e_in.spr_select.valid = '1' then
if e_in.valid = '1' and not is_X(e_in.insn) then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
report "MFSPR to slow SPR " & integer'image(decode_spr_num(e_in.insn));
end if;
slow_op := '1';
if e_in.spr_select.ispmu = '0' then
case e_in.spr_select.sel is
when SPRSEL_LOGD =>
v.se.inc_loga := '1';
when others =>
end case;
v.res2_sel := "10";
else
v.res2_sel := "11";
end if;
else
-- mfspr from unimplemented SPRs should be a nop in
-- supervisor mode and a program interrupt for user mode
if e_in.valid = '1' and not is_X(e_in.insn) then
report "MFSPR to SPR " & integer'image(decode_spr_num(e_in.insn)) &
" invalid";
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if ex1.msr(MSR_PR) = '1' then
illegal := '1';
end if;
end if;
when OP_MFCR =>
when OP_MTCRF =>
when OP_MTMSRD =>
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_msr := '1';
if e_in.insn(16) = '1' then
-- just update EE and RI
v.new_msr(MSR_EE) := c_in(MSR_EE);
v.new_msr(MSR_RI) := c_in(MSR_RI);
else
-- Architecture says to leave out bits 3 (HV), 51 (ME)
-- and 63 (LE) (IBM bit numbering)
if e_in.is_32bit = '0' then
v.new_msr(63 downto 61) := c_in(63 downto 61);
v.new_msr(59 downto 32) := c_in(59 downto 32);
end if;
v.new_msr(31 downto 13) := c_in(31 downto 13);
v.new_msr(11 downto 1) := c_in(11 downto 1);
if c_in(MSR_PR) = '1' then
v.new_msr(MSR_EE) := '1';
v.new_msr(MSR_IR) := '1';
v.new_msr(MSR_DR) := '1';
end if;
if HAS_FPU then
v.fp_intr := fp_in.exception and
(c_in(MSR_FE0) or c_in(MSR_FE1));
end if;
end if;
when OP_MTSPR =>
if e_in.valid = '1' and not is_X(e_in.insn) then
report "MTSPR to SPR " & integer'image(decode_spr_num(e_in.insn)) &
"=" & to_hstring(c_in);
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_pmuspr := e_in.spr_select.ispmu;
if e_in.spr_select.valid = '1' and e_in.spr_select.ispmu = '0' then
case e_in.spr_select.sel is
when SPRSEL_XER =>
v.e.xerc.so := c_in(63-32);
v.e.xerc.ov := c_in(63-33);
v.e.xerc.ca := c_in(63-34);
v.e.xerc.ov32 := c_in(63-44);
v.e.xerc.ca32 := c_in(63-45);
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_xerlow := '1';
when SPRSEL_DEC =>
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_dec := '1';
when SPRSEL_LOGA =>
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.write_loga := '1';
when others =>
end case;
end if;
if e_in.spr_select.valid = '0' and e_in.spr_is_ram = '0' then
-- mtspr to unimplemented SPRs should be a nop in
-- supervisor mode and a program interrupt for user mode
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if ex1.msr(MSR_PR) = '1' then
illegal := '1';
end if;
end if;
when OP_RLC | OP_RLCL | OP_RLCR | OP_SHL | OP_SHR | OP_EXTSWSLI =>
if e_in.output_carry = '1' then
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
set_carry(v.e, rotator_carry, rotator_carry);
end if;
when OP_SETB =>
when OP_ISYNC =>
v.e.redirect := '1';
when OP_ICBI =>
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se.icache_inval := '1';
when OP_MUL_L64 =>
if e_in.is_32bit = '1' then
v.se.mult_32s := '1';
v.res2_sel := "00";
slow_op := '1';
else
-- Use standard multiplier
v.start_mul := '1';
slow_op := '1';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
owait := '1';
end if;
when OP_MUL_H64 =>
v.start_mul := '1';
slow_op := '1';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
owait := '1';
when OP_MUL_H32 =>
v.se.mult_32s := '1';
v.res2_sel := "01";
slow_op := '1';
when OP_DIV | OP_DIVE | OP_MOD =>
if not HAS_FPU then
v.start_div := '1';
slow_op := '1';
owait := '1';
end if;
when OP_FETCH_FAILED =>
-- Handling an ITLB miss doesn't count as having executed an instruction
v.do_trace := '0';
when others =>
if e_in.valid = '1' and e_in.unit = ALU then
report "unhandled insn_type " & insn_type_t'image(e_in.insn_type);
end if;
end case;
if privileged = '1' then
-- generate a program interrupt
v.exception := '1';
-- set bit 45 to indicate privileged instruction type interrupt
v.e.srr1(47 - 45) := '1';
if e_in.valid = '1' then
report "privileged instruction";
end if;
elsif illegal = '1' then
v.exception := '1';
-- Since we aren't doing Hypervisor emulation assist (0xe40) we
-- set bit 44 to indicate we have an illegal
v.e.srr1(47 - 44) := '1';
if e_in.valid = '1' then
report "illegal instruction";
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
elsif HAS_FPU and ex1.msr(MSR_FP) = '0' and e_in.fac = FPU then
-- generate a floating-point unavailable interrupt
v.exception := '1';
v.e.intr_vec := 16#800#;
if e_in.valid = '1' then
report "FP unavailable interrupt";
end if;
end if;
if e_in.unit = ALU then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.complete := e_in.valid and not v.exception and not owait;
v.bypass_valid := e_in.valid and not v.exception and not slow_op;
end if;
actions <= v;
end process;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
-- First execute stage
execute1_1: process(all)
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
variable v : reg_stage1_type;
variable overflow : std_ulogic;
variable lv : Execute1ToLoadstore1Type;
variable irq_valid : std_ulogic;
variable exception : std_ulogic;
variable fv : Execute1ToFPUType;
variable go : std_ulogic;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
variable bypass_valid : std_ulogic;
begin
v := ex1;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if (ex1.busy or l_in.busy or fp_in.busy) = '0' then
v.e := actions.e;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.e.valid := '0';
v.oe := e_in.oe;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.spr_select := e_in.spr_select;
v.pmu_spr_num := e_in.insn(20 downto 16);
v.mul_select := e_in.sub_select(1 downto 0);
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se := side_effect_init;
v.ramspr_wraddr := e_in.ramspr_wraddr;
v.ramspr_odd_data := actions.ramspr_odd_data;
end if;
lv := Execute1ToLoadstore1Init;
fv := Execute1ToFPUInit;
x_to_multiply.valid <= '0';
x_to_mult_32s.valid <= '0';
x_to_divider.valid <= '0';
v.ext_interrupt := '0';
v.taken_branch_event := '0';
v.br_mispredict := '0';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.busy := '0';
bypass_valid := '0';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
irq_valid := ex1.msr(MSR_EE) and (pmu_to_x.intr or ctrl.dec(63) or ext_irq_in);
-- Next insn adder used in a couple of places
next_nia <= std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(e_in.nia) + 4);
-- rotator control signals
right_shift <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_SHR else '0';
rot_clear_left <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_RLC or e_in.insn_type = OP_RLCL else '0';
rot_clear_right <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_RLC or e_in.insn_type = OP_RLCR else '0';
rot_sign_ext <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_EXTSWSLI else '0';
do_popcnt <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_POPCNT else '0';
if valid_in = '1' then
v.prev_op := e_in.insn_type;
end if;
-- Determine if there is any interrupt to be taken
-- before/instead of executing this instruction
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
exception := valid_in and actions.exception;
if valid_in = '1' and e_in.second = '0' then
if HAS_FPU and ex1.fp_exception_next = '1' then
-- This is used for FP-type program interrupts that
-- become pending due to MSR[FE0,FE1] changing from 00 to non-zero.
exception := '1';
v.e.intr_vec := 16#700#;
v.e.srr1 := (others => '0');
v.e.srr1(47 - 43) := '1';
v.e.srr1(47 - 47) := '1';
elsif ex1.trace_next = '1' then
-- Generate a trace interrupt rather than executing the next instruction
-- or taking any asynchronous interrupt
exception := '1';
v.e.intr_vec := 16#d00#;
v.e.srr1 := (others => '0');
v.e.srr1(47 - 33) := '1';
if ex1.prev_op = OP_LOAD or ex1.prev_op = OP_ICBI or ex1.prev_op = OP_ICBT or
ex1.prev_op = OP_DCBT or ex1.prev_op = OP_DCBST or ex1.prev_op = OP_DCBF then
v.e.srr1(47 - 35) := '1';
elsif ex1.prev_op = OP_STORE or ex1.prev_op = OP_DCBZ or
ex1.prev_op = OP_DCBTST then
v.e.srr1(47 - 36) := '1';
end if;
elsif irq_valid = '1' then
-- Don't deliver the interrupt until we have a valid instruction
-- coming in, so we have a valid NIA to put in SRR0.
if pmu_to_x.intr = '1' then
v.e.intr_vec := 16#f00#;
report "IRQ valid: PMU";
elsif ctrl.dec(63) = '1' then
v.e.intr_vec := 16#900#;
report "IRQ valid: DEC";
elsif ext_irq_in = '1' then
v.e.intr_vec := 16#500#;
report "IRQ valid: External";
v.ext_interrupt := '1';
end if;
v.e.srr1 := (others => '0');
exception := '1';
end if;
end if;
v.no_instr_avail := not (e_in.valid or l_in.busy or ex1.busy or fp_in.busy);
go := valid_in and not exception;
v.instr_dispatch := go;
if go = '1' then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.se := actions.se;
v.e.valid := actions.complete;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
bypass_valid := actions.bypass_valid;
v.taken_branch_event := actions.take_branch;
v.trace_next := actions.do_trace;
v.fp_exception_next := actions.fp_intr;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.res2_sel := actions.res2_sel;
v.msr := actions.new_msr;
x_to_multiply.valid <= actions.start_mul;
x_to_mult_32s.valid <= actions.se.mult_32s;
v.mul_in_progress := actions.start_mul;
x_to_divider.valid <= actions.start_div;
v.div_in_progress := actions.start_div;
v.br_mispredict := v.e.redirect and actions.direct_branch;
exception := actions.trap;
if actions.advance_nia = '1' then
v.e.last_nia := next_nia;
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
-- Go busy while division is happening because the
-- divider is not pipelined. Also go busy while a
-- multiply is happening in order to stop following
-- instructions from using the wrong XER value
-- (and for simplicity in the OE=0 case).
v.busy := actions.start_div or actions.start_mul;
-- instruction for other units, i.e. LDST
if e_in.unit = LDST then
lv.valid := '1';
end if;
if HAS_FPU and e_in.unit = FPU then
fv.valid := '1';
end if;
end if;
if not HAS_FPU and ex1.div_in_progress = '1' then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.div_in_progress := not divider_to_x.valid;
v.busy := not divider_to_x.valid;
if divider_to_x.valid = '1' and ex1.oe = '1' then
v.e.xerc.ov := divider_to_x.overflow;
v.e.xerc.ov32 := divider_to_x.overflow;
if divider_to_x.overflow = '1' then
v.e.xerc.so := '1';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
end if;
v.e.valid := divider_to_x.valid;
v.e.write_data := alu_result;
bypass_valid := v.e.valid;
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if ex1.mul_in_progress = '1' then
v.mul_in_progress := not multiply_to_x.valid;
v.mul_finish := multiply_to_x.valid and ex1.oe;
v.e.valid := multiply_to_x.valid and not ex1.oe;
v.busy := not v.e.valid;
v.e.write_data := alu_result;
bypass_valid := v.e.valid;
end if;
if ex1.mul_finish = '1' then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.mul_finish := '0';
v.e.xerc.ov := multiply_to_x.overflow;
v.e.xerc.ov32 := multiply_to_x.overflow;
if multiply_to_x.overflow = '1' then
v.e.xerc.so := '1';
end if;
v.e.valid := '1';
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if v.e.write_xerc_enable = '1' and v.e.valid = '1' then
v.xerc := v.e.xerc;
v.xerc_valid := '1';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if (ex1.busy or l_in.busy or fp_in.busy) = '0' then
v.e.interrupt := exception;
end if;
if v.e.valid = '0' then
v.e.redirect := '0';
v.e.br_last := '0';
end if;
if flush_in = '1' then
v.e.valid := '0';
v.e.interrupt := '0';
v.e.redirect := '0';
v.e.br_last := '0';
v.busy := '0';
v.div_in_progress := '0';
v.mul_in_progress := '0';
v.mul_finish := '0';
v.xerc_valid := '0';
end if;
if flush_in = '1' or interrupt_in.intr = '1' then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.msr := ctrl_tmp.msr;
end if;
if interrupt_in.intr = '1' then
v.trace_next := '0';
v.fp_exception_next := '0';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
bypass_data.tag.valid <= v.e.write_enable and bypass_valid;
bypass_data.tag.tag <= v.e.instr_tag.tag;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
bypass_data.data <= alu_result;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
bypass_cr_data.tag.valid <= v.e.write_cr_enable and bypass_valid;
bypass_cr_data.tag.tag <= v.e.instr_tag.tag;
bypass_cr_data.data <= v.e.write_cr_data;
-- Outputs to loadstore1 (async)
lv.op := e_in.insn_type;
lv.instr_tag := e_in.instr_tag;
lv.addr1 := a_in;
lv.addr2 := b_in;
lv.data := c_in;
lv.write_reg := e_in.write_reg;
lv.length := e_in.data_len;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
lv.byte_reverse := e_in.byte_reverse xnor ex1.msr(MSR_LE);
lv.sign_extend := e_in.sign_extend;
lv.update := e_in.update;
lv.xerc := xerc_in;
lv.reserve := e_in.reserve;
lv.rc := e_in.rc;
lv.insn := e_in.insn;
-- invert_a field is overloaded for load/store instructions
-- to mark l*cix and st*cix
lv.ci := e_in.invert_a;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
lv.virt_mode := ex1.msr(MSR_DR);
lv.priv_mode := not ex1.msr(MSR_PR);
lv.mode_32bit := not ex1.msr(MSR_SF);
lv.is_32bit := e_in.is_32bit;
core: Implement quadword loads and stores This implements the lq, stq, lqarx and stqcx. instructions. These instructions all access two consecutive GPRs; for example the "lq %r6,0(%r3)" instruction will load the doubleword at the address in R3 into R7 and the doubleword at address R3 + 8 into R6. To cope with having two GPR sources or destinations, the instruction gets repeated at the decode2 stage, that is, for each lq/stq/lqarx/stqcx. coming in from decode1, two instructions get sent out to execute1. For these instructions, the RS or RT register gets modified on one of the iterations by setting the LSB of the register number. In LE mode, the first iteration uses RS|1 or RT|1 and the second iteration uses RS or RT. In BE mode, this is done the other way around. In order for decode2 to know what endianness is currently in use, we pass the big_endian flag down from icache through decode1 to decode2. This is always in sync with what execute1 is using because only rfid or an interrupt can change MSR[LE], and those operations all cause a flush and redirect. There is now an extra column in the decode tables in decode1 to indicate whether the instruction needs to be repeated. Decode1 also enforces the rule that lq with RT = RT and lqarx with RA = RT or RB = RT are illegal. Decode2 now passes a 'repeat' flag and a 'second' flag to execute1, and execute1 passes them on to loadstore1. The 'repeat' flag is set for both iterations of a repeated instruction, and 'second' is set on the second iteration. Execute1 does not take asynchronous or trace interrupts on the second iteration of a repeated instruction. Loadstore1 uses 'next_addr' for the second iteration of a repeated load/store so that we access the second doubleword of the memory operand. Thus loadstore1 accesses the doublewords in increasing memory order. For 16-byte loads this means that the first iteration writes GPR RT|1. It is possible that RA = RT|1 (this is a legal but non-preferred form), meaning that if the memory operand was misaligned, the first iteration would overwrite RA but then the second iteration might take a page fault, leading to corrupted state. To avoid that possibility, 16-byte loads in LE mode take an alignment interrupt if the operand is not 16-byte aligned. (This is the case anyway for lqarx, and we enforce it for lq as well.) Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
4 years ago
lv.repeat := e_in.repeat;
lv.second := e_in.second;
lv.e2stall := fp_in.f2stall;
-- Outputs to FPU
fv.op := e_in.insn_type;
fv.insn := e_in.insn;
fv.itag := e_in.instr_tag;
fv.single := e_in.is_32bit;
fv.is_signed := e_in.is_signed;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
fv.fe_mode := ex1.msr(MSR_FE0) & ex1.msr(MSR_FE1);
fv.fra := a_in;
fv.frb := b_in;
fv.frc := c_in;
fv.valid_a := e_in.reg_valid1;
fv.valid_b := e_in.reg_valid2;
fv.valid_c := e_in.reg_valid3;
fv.frt := e_in.write_reg;
fv.rc := e_in.rc;
fv.out_cr := e_in.output_cr;
fv.m32b := not ex1.msr(MSR_SF);
fv.oe := e_in.oe;
fv.xerc := xerc_in;
fv.stall := l_in.l2stall;
-- Update registers
ex1in <= v;
-- update outputs
l_out <= lv;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
fp_out <= fv;
irq_valid_log <= irq_valid;
end process;
-- Slow SPR read mux
with ex1.spr_select.sel select spr_result <=
ctrl.tb when SPRSEL_TB,
32x"0" & ctrl.tb(63 downto 32) when SPRSEL_TBU,
ctrl.dec when SPRSEL_DEC,
32x"0" & PVR_MICROWATT when SPRSEL_PVR,
log_wr_addr & ex2.log_addr_spr when SPRSEL_LOGA,
log_rd_data when SPRSEL_LOGD,
ctrl.cfar when SPRSEL_CFAR,
assemble_xer(ex1.e.xerc, ctrl.xer_low) when others;
stage2_stall <= l_in.l2stall or fp_in.f2stall;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
-- Second execute stage control
execute2_1: process(all)
variable v : reg_stage2_type;
variable bypass_valid : std_ulogic;
variable rcresult : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable sprres : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable ex_result : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable cr_res : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
variable cr_mask : std_ulogic_vector(7 downto 0);
variable sign, zero : std_ulogic;
variable rcnz_hi, rcnz_lo : std_ulogic;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
begin
v := ex2;
if stage2_stall = '0' then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.e := ex1.e;
v.se := ex1.se;
v.ext_interrupt := ex1.ext_interrupt;
v.taken_branch_event := ex1.taken_branch_event;
v.br_mispredict := ex1.br_mispredict;
end if;
if ex1.se.mult_32s = '1' and ex1.oe = '1' then
v.e.xerc.ov := mult_32s_to_x.overflow;
v.e.xerc.ov32 := mult_32s_to_x.overflow;
if mult_32s_to_x.overflow = '1' then
v.e.xerc.so := '1';
end if;
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
ctrl_tmp <= ctrl;
-- FIXME: run at 512MHz not core freq
ctrl_tmp.tb <= std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(ctrl.tb) + 1);
ctrl_tmp.dec <= std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(ctrl.dec) - 1);
x_to_pmu.mfspr <= '0';
x_to_pmu.mtspr <= '0';
x_to_pmu.tbbits(3) <= ctrl.tb(63 - 47);
x_to_pmu.tbbits(2) <= ctrl.tb(63 - 51);
x_to_pmu.tbbits(1) <= ctrl.tb(63 - 55);
x_to_pmu.tbbits(0) <= ctrl.tb(63 - 63);
x_to_pmu.pmm_msr <= ctrl.msr(MSR_PMM);
x_to_pmu.pr_msr <= ctrl.msr(MSR_PR);
if v.e.valid = '0' or flush_in = '1' then
v.e.write_enable := '0';
v.e.write_cr_enable := '0';
v.e.write_xerc_enable := '0';
v.e.redirect := '0';
v.e.br_last := '0';
v.taken_branch_event := '0';
v.br_mispredict := '0';
end if;
if flush_in = '1' then
v.e.valid := '0';
v.e.interrupt := '0';
v.se := side_effect_init;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
v.ext_interrupt := '0';
end if;
-- This is split like this because mfspr doesn't have an Rc bit,
-- and we don't want the zero-detect logic to be after the
-- SPR mux for timing reasons.
if ex1.se.mult_32s = '1' then
if ex1.res2_sel(0) = '0' then
rcresult := mult_32s_to_x.result(63 downto 0);
else
rcresult := mult_32s_to_x.result(63 downto 32) &
mult_32s_to_x.result(63 downto 32);
end if;
elsif ex1.res2_sel(0) = '0' then
rcresult := ex1.e.write_data;
else
rcresult := countbits_result;
end if;
if ex1.res2_sel(0) = '0' then
sprres := spr_result;
else
sprres := pmu_to_x.spr_val;
end if;
if ex1.res2_sel(1) = '0' then
ex_result := rcresult;
else
ex_result := sprres;
end if;
cr_res := ex1.e.write_cr_data;
cr_mask := ex1.e.write_cr_mask;
if ex1.e.rc = '1' and ex1.e.write_enable = '1' then
rcnz_lo := or (rcresult(31 downto 0));
if ex1.e.mode_32bit = '0' then
rcnz_hi := or (rcresult(63 downto 32));
zero := not (rcnz_hi or rcnz_lo);
sign := ex_result(63);
else
zero := not rcnz_lo;
sign := ex_result(31);
end if;
cr_res(31) := sign;
cr_res(30) := not (sign or zero);
cr_res(29) := zero;
cr_res(28) := v.e.xerc.so;
cr_mask(7) := '1';
end if;
if stage2_stall = '0' then
v.e.write_data := ex_result;
v.e.write_cr_data := cr_res;
v.e.write_cr_mask := cr_mask;
if ex1.e.rc = '1' and ex1.e.write_enable = '1' and v.e.valid = '1' then
v.e.write_cr_enable := '1';
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if ex1.se.write_msr = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.msr <= ex1.msr;
end if;
if ex1.se.write_xerlow = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.xer_low <= ex1.e.write_data(17 downto 0);
end if;
if ex1.se.write_dec = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.dec <= ex1.e.write_data;
end if;
if ex1.se.write_cfar = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.cfar <= ex1.e.last_nia;
end if;
if ex1.se.write_loga = '1' then
v.log_addr_spr := ex1.e.write_data(31 downto 0);
elsif ex1.se.inc_loga = '1' then
v.log_addr_spr := std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(ex2.log_addr_spr) + 1);
end if;
x_to_pmu.mtspr <= ex1.se.write_pmuspr;
end if;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
if interrupt_in.intr = '1' then
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_SF) <= '1';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_EE) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_PR) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_SE) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_BE) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_FP) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_FE0) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_FE1) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_IR) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_DR) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_RI) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_LE) <= '1';
end if;
bypass_valid := ex1.e.valid;
if stage2_stall = '1' and ex1.res2_sel(1) = '1' then
bypass_valid := '0';
end if;
bypass2_data.tag.valid <= ex1.e.write_enable and bypass_valid;
bypass2_data.tag.tag <= ex1.e.instr_tag.tag;
bypass2_data.data <= ex_result;
bypass2_cr_data.tag.valid <= (ex1.e.write_cr_enable or (ex1.e.rc and ex1.e.write_enable))
and bypass_valid;
bypass2_cr_data.tag.tag <= ex1.e.instr_tag.tag;
bypass2_cr_data.data <= cr_res;
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
-- Update registers
ex2in <= v;
-- update outputs
e_out <= ex2.e;
e_out.msr <= msr_copy(ctrl.msr);
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
terminate_out <= ex2.se.terminate;
icache_inval <= ex2.se.icache_inval;
exception_log <= v.e.interrupt;
end process;
sim_dump_test: if SIM generate
dump_exregs: process(all)
variable xer : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
begin
if sim_dump = '1' then
report "LR " & to_hstring(even_sprs(to_integer(RAMSPR_LR)));
report "CTR " & to_hstring(odd_sprs(to_integer(RAMSPR_CTR)));
sim_dump_done <= '1';
else
sim_dump_done <= '0';
end if;
end process;
end generate;
-- Keep GHDL synthesis happy
sim_dump_test_synth: if not SIM generate
sim_dump_done <= '0';
end generate;
e1_log: if LOG_LENGTH > 0 generate
signal log_data : std_ulogic_vector(11 downto 0);
begin
ex1_log : process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
log_data <= ctrl.msr(MSR_EE) & ctrl.msr(MSR_PR) &
ctrl.msr(MSR_IR) & ctrl.msr(MSR_DR) &
exception_log &
irq_valid_log &
interrupt_in.intr &
Add a second execute stage to the pipeline This adds a second execute stage to the pipeline, in order to match up the length of the pipeline through loadstore and dcache with the length through execute1. This will ultimately enable us to get rid of the 1-cycle bubble that we currently have when issuing ALU instructions after one or more LSU instructions. Most ALU instructions execute in the first stage, except for count-zeroes and popcount instructions (which take two cycles and do some of their work in the second stage) and mfspr/mtspr to "slow" SPRs (TB, DEC, PVR, LOGA/LOGD, CFAR). Multiply and divide/mod instructions take several cycles but the instruction stays in the first stage (ex1) and ex1.busy is asserted until the operation is complete. There is currently a bypass from the first stage but not the second stage. Performance is down somewhat because of that and because this doesn't yet eliminate the bubble between LSU and ALU instructions. The forwarding of XER common bits has been changed somewhat because now there is another pipeline stage between ex1 and the committed state in cr_file. The simplest thing for now is to record the last value written and use that, unless there has been a flush, in which case the committed state (obtained via e_in.xerc) is used. Note that this fixes what was previously a benign bug in control.vhdl, where it was possible for control to forget an instructions dependency on a value from a previous instruction (a GPR or the CR) if this instruction writes the value and the instruction gets to the point where it could issue but is blocked by the busy signal from execute1. In that situation, control may incorrectly not indicate that a bypass should be used. That didn't matter previously because, for ALU and FPU instructions, there was only one previous instruction in flight and once the current instruction could issue, the previous instruction was completing and the correct value would be obtained from register_file or cr_file. For loadstore instructions there could be two being executed, but because there are no bypass paths, failing to indicate use of a bypass path is fine. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
2 years ago
ex2.e.write_enable &
ex2.e.valid &
(ex2.e.redirect or ex2.e.interrupt) &
ex1.busy &
flush_in;
end if;
end process;
log_out <= log_data;
end generate;
end architecture behaviour;