From 3df4806fd8792c95b44b3c8813fcf6c8293cfb51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:52:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Minor corrections.

Signed-off-by: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
---
 specification/ch_1.xml |  2 +-
 specification/ch_3.xml | 12 +-----------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/specification/ch_1.xml b/specification/ch_1.xml
index 1316397..cd198f1 100644
--- a/specification/ch_1.xml
+++ b/specification/ch_1.xml
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
     </itemizedlist>
   </section>
   <section revisionflag="added">
-    <title>Changes from release 1.4</title>
+    <title>Changes from Revision 1.4</title>
     <para>TBD</para>
   </section>
 </chapter>
diff --git a/specification/ch_3.xml b/specification/ch_3.xml
index 4d04a29..b03e27b 100644
--- a/specification/ch_3.xml
+++ b/specification/ch_3.xml
@@ -8171,8 +8171,7 @@ nop</programlisting>
                 <para>One-bit field. This field is set to 1 if this function
                 does not have a TOC. For example, a stackless leaf assembly
                 language routine with no references to external objects.
-		<phrase revisionflag="added">[To discuss: What value should be
-		set for PC-relative functions?]</phrase></para>
+		</para>
               </entry>
             </row>
             <row>
@@ -8340,15 +8339,6 @@ nop</programlisting>
                 parameters are placed in the Parameter Save Area.</para>
               </entry>
             </row>
-            <row revisionflag="added">
-              <entry>
-                <para>???</para>
-              </entry>
-              <entry>
-                <para>[To discuss: Can/should we add a flag for PC-relative?]
-		</para>
-              </entry>
-            </row>
           </tbody>
         </tgroup>
       </informaltable>