dcache: Remove LOAD_UPDATE2 state

Since we removed one cycle from the load hit case, we actually no
longer need the extra cycle provided by having the LOAD_UPDATE
state.  Therefore this makes the load hit case in the IDLE and
NEXT_DWORD states go to LOAD_UPDATE2 rather than LOAD_UPDATE.
Then we remove LOAD_UPDATE and then rename LOAD_UPDATE2 to
LOAD_UPDATE.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
pull/153/head
Paul Mackerras 4 years ago
parent 81d777be02
commit ef9c1efd72

@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ architecture rtl of dcache is
PRE_NEXT_DWORD, -- Extra state before NEXT_DWORD
NEXT_DWORD, -- Starting the 2nd xfer of misaligned
LOAD_UPDATE, -- Load with update extra cycle
LOAD_UPDATE2, -- Load with update extra cycle
RELOAD_WAIT_ACK, -- Cache reload wait ack
STORE_WAIT_ACK, -- Store wait ack
NC_LOAD_WAIT_ACK);-- Non-cachable load wait ack
@ -824,7 +823,6 @@ begin
if two_dwords = '1' then
r1.state <= NEXT_DWORD;
elsif d_in.update = '1' then
-- We have a load with update hit, we need the delayed update cycle
r1.state <= LOAD_UPDATE;
end if;
else
@ -952,7 +950,7 @@ begin
if r1.two_dwords and not r1.second_dword then
r1.state <= PRE_NEXT_DWORD;
elsif r1.req.update = '1' then
r1.state <= LOAD_UPDATE2;
r1.state <= LOAD_UPDATE;
report "completing miss with load-update !";
else
r1.state <= IDLE;
@ -965,9 +963,6 @@ begin
end if;

when LOAD_UPDATE =>
-- We need the extra cycle to complete a load with update
r1.state <= LOAD_UPDATE2;
when LOAD_UPDATE2 =>
-- We need the extra cycle to complete a load with update
r1.update_valid <= '1';
r1.state <= IDLE;
@ -983,7 +978,7 @@ begin
if r1.two_dwords and not r1.second_dword then
r1.state <= NEXT_DWORD;
elsif r1.state = NC_LOAD_WAIT_ACK and r1.req.update = '1' then
r1.state <= LOAD_UPDATE2;
r1.state <= LOAD_UPDATE;
else
r1.state <= IDLE;
end if;

Loading…
Cancel
Save