You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
microwatt/execute1.vhdl

1076 lines
38 KiB
VHDL

library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
library work;
use work.decode_types.all;
use work.common.all;
use work.helpers.all;
use work.crhelpers.all;
use work.insn_helpers.all;
use work.ppc_fx_insns.all;
entity execute1 is
generic (
EX1_BYPASS : boolean := true
);
port (
clk : in std_ulogic;
rst : in std_ulogic;
-- asynchronous
flush_out : out std_ulogic;
busy_out : out std_ulogic;
e_in : in Decode2ToExecute1Type;
l_in : in Loadstore1ToExecute1Type;
ext_irq_in : std_ulogic;
-- asynchronous
l_out : out Execute1ToLoadstore1Type;
f_out : out Execute1ToFetch1Type;
e_out : out Execute1ToWritebackType;
dbg_msr_out : out std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
icache_inval : out std_ulogic;
terminate_out : out std_ulogic;
log_out : out std_ulogic_vector(14 downto 0);
log_rd_addr : out std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
log_rd_data : in std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
log_wr_addr : in std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0)
);
end entity execute1;
architecture behaviour of execute1 is
type reg_type is record
e : Execute1ToWritebackType;
busy: std_ulogic;
terminate: std_ulogic;
lr_update : std_ulogic;
next_lr : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
mul_in_progress : std_ulogic;
div_in_progress : std_ulogic;
cntz_in_progress : std_ulogic;
slow_op_insn : insn_type_t;
slow_op_dest : gpr_index_t;
slow_op_rc : std_ulogic;
slow_op_oe : std_ulogic;
slow_op_xerc : xer_common_t;
last_nia : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
log_addr_spr : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
end record;
constant reg_type_init : reg_type :=
(e => Execute1ToWritebackInit, busy => '0', lr_update => '0', terminate => '0',
mul_in_progress => '0', div_in_progress => '0', cntz_in_progress => '0',
slow_op_insn => OP_ILLEGAL, slow_op_rc => '0', slow_op_oe => '0', slow_op_xerc => xerc_init,
next_lr => (others => '0'), last_nia => (others => '0'), others => (others => '0'));
signal r, rin : reg_type;
signal a_in, b_in, c_in : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal valid_in : std_ulogic;
signal ctrl: ctrl_t := (irq_state => WRITE_SRR0, others => (others => '0'));
signal ctrl_tmp: ctrl_t := (irq_state => WRITE_SRR0, others => (others => '0'));
signal right_shift, rot_clear_left, rot_clear_right: std_ulogic;
signal rot_sign_ext: std_ulogic;
signal rotator_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal rotator_carry: std_ulogic;
signal logical_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
signal countzero_result: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
-- multiply signals
signal x_to_multiply: Execute1ToMultiplyType;
signal multiply_to_x: MultiplyToExecute1Type;
-- divider signals
signal x_to_divider: Execute1ToDividerType;
signal divider_to_x: DividerToExecute1Type;
-- signals for logging
signal exception_log : std_ulogic;
signal irq_valid_log : std_ulogic;
signal log_data : std_ulogic_vector(14 downto 0);
type privilege_level is (USER, SUPER);
type op_privilege_array is array(insn_type_t) of privilege_level;
constant op_privilege: op_privilege_array := (
OP_ATTN => SUPER,
OP_MFMSR => SUPER,
OP_MTMSRD => SUPER,
OP_RFID => SUPER,
dcache: Implement data TLB This adds a TLB to dcache, providing the ability to translate addresses for loads and stores. No protection mechanism has been implemented yet. The MSR_DR bit controls whether addresses are translated through the TLB. The TLB is a fixed-pagesize, set-associative cache. Currently the page size is 4kB and the TLB is 2-way set associative with 64 entries per set. This implements the tlbie instruction. RB bits 10 and 11 control whether the whole TLB is invalidated (if either bit is 1) or just a single entry corresponding to the effective page number in bits 12-63 of RB. As an extension until we get a hardware page table walk, a tlbie instruction with RB bits 9-11 set to 001 will load an entry into the TLB. The TLB entry value is in RS in the format of a radix PTE. Currently there is no proper handling of TLB misses. The load or store will not be performed but no interrupt is generated. In order to make timing at 100MHz on the Arty A7-100, we compare the real address from each way of the TLB with the tag from each way of the cache in parallel (requiring # TLB ways * # cache ways comparators). Then the result is selected based on which way hit in the TLB. That avoids a timing path going through the TLB EA comparators, the multiplexer that selects the RA, and the cache tag comparators. The hack where addresses of the form 0xc------- are marked as cache-inhibited is kept for now but restricted to real-mode accesses. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
OP_TLBIE => SUPER,
others => USER
);
function instr_is_privileged(op: insn_type_t; insn: std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0))
return boolean is
begin
if op_privilege(op) = SUPER then
return true;
elsif op = OP_MFSPR or op = OP_MTSPR then
return insn(20) = '1';
else
return false;
end if;
end;
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
procedure set_carry(e: inout Execute1ToWritebackType;
carry32 : in std_ulogic;
carry : in std_ulogic) is
begin
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
e.xerc.ca32 := carry32;
e.xerc.ca := carry;
e.write_xerc_enable := '1';
end;
procedure set_ov(e: inout Execute1ToWritebackType;
ov : in std_ulogic;
ov32 : in std_ulogic) is
begin
e.xerc.ov32 := ov32;
e.xerc.ov := ov;
if ov = '1' then
e.xerc.so := '1';
end if;
e.write_xerc_enable := '1';
end;
function calc_ov(msb_a : std_ulogic; msb_b: std_ulogic;
ca: std_ulogic; msb_r: std_ulogic) return std_ulogic is
begin
return (ca xor msb_r) and not (msb_a xor msb_b);
end;
function decode_input_carry(ic : carry_in_t;
xerc : xer_common_t) return std_ulogic is
begin
case ic is
when ZERO =>
return '0';
when CA =>
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
return xerc.ca;
when ONE =>
return '1';
end case;
end;
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
function msr_copy(msr: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0))
return std_ulogic_vector is
variable msr_out: std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
begin
-- ISA says this:
-- Defined MSR bits are classified as either full func-
-- tion or partial function. Full function MSR bits are
-- saved in SRR1 or HSRR1 when an interrupt other
-- than a System Call Vectored interrupt occurs and
-- restored by rfscv, rfid, or hrfid, while partial func-
-- tion MSR bits are not saved or restored.
-- Full function MSR bits lie in the range 0:32, 37:41, and
-- 48:63, and partial function MSR bits lie in the range
-- 33:36 and 42:47. (Note this is IBM bit numbering).
msr_out := (others => '0');
msr_out(63 downto 31) := msr(63 downto 31);
msr_out(26 downto 22) := msr(26 downto 22);
msr_out(15 downto 0) := msr(15 downto 0);
return msr_out;
end;
begin
rotator_0: entity work.rotator
port map (
rs => c_in,
ra => a_in,
shift => b_in(6 downto 0),
insn => e_in.insn,
is_32bit => e_in.is_32bit,
right_shift => right_shift,
arith => e_in.is_signed,
clear_left => rot_clear_left,
clear_right => rot_clear_right,
sign_ext_rs => rot_sign_ext,
result => rotator_result,
carry_out => rotator_carry
);
logical_0: entity work.logical
port map (
rs => c_in,
rb => b_in,
op => e_in.insn_type,
invert_in => e_in.invert_a,
invert_out => e_in.invert_out,
result => logical_result,
datalen => e_in.data_len
);
countzero_0: entity work.zero_counter
port map (
clk => clk,
rs => c_in,
count_right => e_in.insn(10),
is_32bit => e_in.is_32bit,
result => countzero_result
);
multiply_0: entity work.multiply
port map (
clk => clk,
m_in => x_to_multiply,
m_out => multiply_to_x
);
divider_0: entity work.divider
port map (
clk => clk,
rst => rst,
d_in => x_to_divider,
d_out => divider_to_x
);
dbg_msr_out <= ctrl.msr;
log_rd_addr <= r.log_addr_spr;
a_in <= r.e.write_data when EX1_BYPASS and e_in.bypass_data1 = '1' else e_in.read_data1;
b_in <= r.e.write_data when EX1_BYPASS and e_in.bypass_data2 = '1' else e_in.read_data2;
c_in <= r.e.write_data when EX1_BYPASS and e_in.bypass_data3 = '1' else e_in.read_data3;
busy_out <= l_in.busy or r.busy;
valid_in <= e_in.valid and not busy_out;
terminate_out <= r.terminate;
execute1_0: process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if rst = '1' then
r <= reg_type_init;
ctrl.msr <= (MSR_SF => '1', MSR_LE => '1', others => '0');
ctrl.irq_state <= WRITE_SRR0;
else
r <= rin;
ctrl <= ctrl_tmp;
assert not (r.lr_update = '1' and valid_in = '1')
report "LR update collision with valid in EX1"
severity failure;
if r.lr_update = '1' then
report "LR update to " & to_hstring(r.next_lr);
end if;
end if;
end if;
end process;
execute1_1: process(all)
variable v : reg_type;
variable a_inv : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable result : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
variable newcrf : std_ulogic_vector(3 downto 0);
variable result_with_carry : std_ulogic_vector(64 downto 0);
variable result_en : std_ulogic;
variable crnum : crnum_t;
variable crbit : integer range 0 to 31;
variable scrnum : crnum_t;
variable lo, hi : integer;
variable sh, mb, me : std_ulogic_vector(5 downto 0);
variable sh32, mb32, me32 : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
variable bo, bi : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
variable bf, bfa : std_ulogic_vector(2 downto 0);
variable cr_op : std_ulogic_vector(9 downto 0);
variable cr_operands : std_ulogic_vector(1 downto 0);
variable bt, ba, bb : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
variable btnum, banum, bbnum : integer range 0 to 31;
variable crresult : std_ulogic;
variable l : std_ulogic;
variable next_nia : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
variable carry_32, carry_64 : std_ulogic;
variable sign1, sign2 : std_ulogic;
variable abs1, abs2 : signed(63 downto 0);
variable overflow : std_ulogic;
variable zerohi, zerolo : std_ulogic;
variable msb_a, msb_b : std_ulogic;
variable a_lt : std_ulogic;
variable lv : Execute1ToLoadstore1Type;
variable irq_valid : std_ulogic;
variable exception : std_ulogic;
variable exception_nextpc : std_ulogic;
variable trapval : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
variable illegal : std_ulogic;
variable is_branch : std_ulogic;
variable taken_branch : std_ulogic;
variable abs_branch : std_ulogic;
variable spr_val : std_ulogic_vector(63 downto 0);
begin
result := (others => '0');
result_with_carry := (others => '0');
result_en := '0';
newcrf := (others => '0');
is_branch := '0';
taken_branch := '0';
abs_branch := '0';
v := r;
v.e := Execute1ToWritebackInit;
lv := Execute1ToLoadstore1Init;
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
-- XER forwarding. To avoid having to track XER hazards, we
-- use the previously latched value.
--
-- If the XER was modified by a multiply or a divide, those are
-- single issue, we'll get the up to date value from decode2 from
-- the register file.
--
-- If it was modified by an instruction older than the previous
-- one in EX1, it will have also hit writeback and will be up
-- to date in decode2.
--
-- That leaves us with the case where it was updated by the previous
-- instruction in EX1. In that case, we can forward it back here.
--
-- This will break if we allow pipelining of multiply and divide,
-- but ideally, those should go via EX1 anyway and run as a state
-- machine from here.
--
-- One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction
-- in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our
-- writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous
-- XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value.
--
-- We will need to handle that if we ever make stcx. not single issue
--
-- We always pass a valid XER value downto writeback even when
-- we aren't updating it, in order for XER:SO -> CR0:SO transfer
-- to work for RC instructions.
--
if r.e.write_xerc_enable = '1' then
v.e.xerc := r.e.xerc;
else
v.e.xerc := e_in.xerc;
end if;
v.lr_update := '0';
v.mul_in_progress := '0';
v.div_in_progress := '0';
v.cntz_in_progress := '0';
-- signals to multiply and divide units
sign1 := '0';
sign2 := '0';
if e_in.is_signed = '1' then
if e_in.is_32bit = '1' then
sign1 := a_in(31);
sign2 := b_in(31);
else
sign1 := a_in(63);
sign2 := b_in(63);
end if;
end if;
-- take absolute values
if sign1 = '0' then
abs1 := signed(a_in);
else
abs1 := - signed(a_in);
end if;
if sign2 = '0' then
abs2 := signed(b_in);
else
abs2 := - signed(b_in);
end if;
x_to_multiply <= Execute1ToMultiplyInit;
x_to_multiply.is_32bit <= e_in.is_32bit;
x_to_divider <= Execute1ToDividerInit;
x_to_divider.is_signed <= e_in.is_signed;
x_to_divider.is_32bit <= e_in.is_32bit;
if e_in.insn_type = OP_MOD then
x_to_divider.is_modulus <= '1';
end if;
x_to_multiply.neg_result <= sign1 xor sign2;
x_to_divider.neg_result <= sign1 xor (sign2 and not x_to_divider.is_modulus);
if e_in.is_32bit = '0' then
-- 64-bit forms
x_to_multiply.data1 <= std_ulogic_vector(abs1);
x_to_multiply.data2 <= std_ulogic_vector(abs2);
if e_in.insn_type = OP_DIVE then
x_to_divider.is_extended <= '1';
end if;
x_to_divider.dividend <= std_ulogic_vector(abs1);
x_to_divider.divisor <= std_ulogic_vector(abs2);
else
-- 32-bit forms
x_to_multiply.data1 <= x"00000000" & std_ulogic_vector(abs1(31 downto 0));
x_to_multiply.data2 <= x"00000000" & std_ulogic_vector(abs2(31 downto 0));
x_to_divider.is_extended <= '0';
if e_in.insn_type = OP_DIVE then -- extended forms
x_to_divider.dividend <= std_ulogic_vector(abs1(31 downto 0)) & x"00000000";
else
x_to_divider.dividend <= x"00000000" & std_ulogic_vector(abs1(31 downto 0));
end if;
x_to_divider.divisor <= x"00000000" & std_ulogic_vector(abs2(31 downto 0));
end if;
ctrl_tmp <= ctrl;
-- FIXME: run at 512MHz not core freq
ctrl_tmp.tb <= std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(ctrl.tb) + 1);
ctrl_tmp.dec <= std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(ctrl.dec) - 1);
irq_valid := '0';
if ctrl.msr(MSR_EE) = '1' then
if ctrl.dec(63) = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#900#, 64));
report "IRQ valid: DEC";
irq_valid := '1';
elsif ext_irq_in = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#500#, 64));
report "IRQ valid: External";
irq_valid := '1';
end if;
end if;
v.terminate := '0';
icache_inval <= '0';
v.busy := '0';
f_out <= Execute1ToFetch1TypeInit;
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
-- send MSR[IR] and ~MSR[PR] up to fetch1
f_out.virt_mode <= ctrl.msr(MSR_IR);
f_out.priv_mode <= not ctrl.msr(MSR_PR);
-- Next insn adder used in a couple of places
next_nia := std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(e_in.nia) + 4);
-- rotator control signals
right_shift <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_SHR else '0';
rot_clear_left <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_RLC or e_in.insn_type = OP_RLCL else '0';
rot_clear_right <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_RLC or e_in.insn_type = OP_RLCR else '0';
rot_sign_ext <= '1' when e_in.insn_type = OP_EXTSWSLI else '0';
ctrl_tmp.irq_state <= WRITE_SRR0;
exception := '0';
illegal := '0';
exception_nextpc := '0';
v.e.exc_write_enable := '0';
v.e.exc_write_reg := fast_spr_num(SPR_SRR0);
v.e.exc_write_data := e_in.nia;
if valid_in = '1' then
v.last_nia := e_in.nia;
end if;
if ctrl.irq_state = WRITE_SRR1 then
v.e.exc_write_reg := fast_spr_num(SPR_SRR1);
v.e.exc_write_data := ctrl.srr1;
v.e.exc_write_enable := '1';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_SF) <= '1';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_EE) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_PR) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_IR) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_DR) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_RI) <= '0';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_LE) <= '1';
f_out.redirect <= '1';
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
f_out.virt_mode <= '0';
f_out.priv_mode <= '1';
f_out.redirect_nia <= ctrl.irq_nia;
v.e.valid := '1';
report "Writing SRR1: " & to_hstring(ctrl.srr1);
elsif irq_valid = '1' and valid_in = '1' then
-- we need two cycles to write srr0 and 1
-- will need more when we have to write HEIR
-- Don't deliver the interrupt until we have a valid instruction
-- coming in, so we have a valid NIA to put in SRR0.
exception := '1';
ctrl_tmp.srr1 <= msr_copy(ctrl.msr);
elsif valid_in = '1' and ctrl.msr(MSR_PR) = '1' and
instr_is_privileged(e_in.insn_type, e_in.insn) then
-- generate a program interrupt
exception := '1';
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#700#, 64));
ctrl_tmp.srr1 <= msr_copy(ctrl.msr);
-- set bit 45 to indicate privileged instruction type interrupt
ctrl_tmp.srr1(63 - 45) <= '1';
report "privileged instruction";
elsif valid_in = '1' and e_in.unit = ALU then
report "execute nia " & to_hstring(e_in.nia);
v.e.valid := '1';
v.e.write_reg := e_in.write_reg;
v.slow_op_insn := e_in.insn_type;
v.slow_op_dest := gspr_to_gpr(e_in.write_reg);
v.slow_op_rc := e_in.rc;
v.slow_op_oe := e_in.oe;
v.slow_op_xerc := v.e.xerc;
case_0: case e_in.insn_type is
when OP_ILLEGAL =>
-- we need two cycles to write srr0 and 1
-- will need more when we have to write HEIR
illegal := '1';
when OP_SC =>
-- check bit 1 of the instruction is 1 so we know this is sc;
-- 0 would mean scv, so generate an illegal instruction interrupt
-- we need two cycles to write srr0 and 1
if e_in.insn(1) = '1' then
exception := '1';
exception_nextpc := '1';
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#C00#, 64));
ctrl_tmp.srr1 <= msr_copy(ctrl.msr);
report "sc";
else
illegal := '1';
end if;
when OP_ATTN =>
-- check bits 1-10 of the instruction to make sure it's attn
-- if not then it is illegal
if e_in.insn(10 downto 1) = "0100000000" then
v.terminate := '1';
report "ATTN";
else
illegal := '1';
end if;
when OP_NOP =>
-- Do nothing
when OP_ADD | OP_CMP | OP_TRAP =>
if e_in.invert_a = '0' then
a_inv := a_in;
else
a_inv := not a_in;
end if;
result_with_carry := ppc_adde(a_inv, b_in,
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
decode_input_carry(e_in.input_carry, v.e.xerc));
result := result_with_carry(63 downto 0);
carry_32 := result(32) xor a_inv(32) xor b_in(32);
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
carry_64 := result_with_carry(64);
if e_in.insn_type = OP_ADD then
if e_in.output_carry = '1' then
set_carry(v.e, carry_32, carry_64);
end if;
if e_in.oe = '1' then
set_ov(v.e,
calc_ov(a_inv(63), b_in(63), carry_64, result_with_carry(63)),
calc_ov(a_inv(31), b_in(31), carry_32, result_with_carry(31)));
end if;
result_en := '1';
else
-- trap, CMP and CMPL instructions
-- Note, we have done RB - RA, not RA - RB
if e_in.insn_type = OP_CMP then
l := insn_l(e_in.insn);
else
l := not e_in.is_32bit;
end if;
zerolo := not (or (a_in(31 downto 0) xor b_in(31 downto 0)));
zerohi := not (or (a_in(63 downto 32) xor b_in(63 downto 32)));
if zerolo = '1' and (l = '0' or zerohi = '1') then
-- values are equal
trapval := "00100";
else
if l = '1' then
-- 64-bit comparison
msb_a := a_in(63);
msb_b := b_in(63);
else
-- 32-bit comparison
msb_a := a_in(31);
msb_b := b_in(31);
end if;
if msb_a /= msb_b then
-- Subtraction might overflow, but
-- comparison is clear from MSB difference.
-- for signed, 0 is greater; for unsigned, 1 is greater
trapval := msb_a & msb_b & '0' & msb_b & msb_a;
else
-- Subtraction cannot overflow since MSBs are equal.
-- carry = 1 indicates RA is smaller (signed or unsigned)
a_lt := (not l and carry_32) or (l and carry_64);
trapval := a_lt & not a_lt & '0' & a_lt & not a_lt;
end if;
end if;
if e_in.insn_type = OP_CMP then
if e_in.is_signed = '1' then
newcrf := trapval(4 downto 2) & v.e.xerc.so;
else
newcrf := trapval(1 downto 0) & trapval(2) & v.e.xerc.so;
end if;
bf := insn_bf(e_in.insn);
crnum := to_integer(unsigned(bf));
v.e.write_cr_enable := '1';
v.e.write_cr_mask := num_to_fxm(crnum);
for i in 0 to 7 loop
lo := i*4;
hi := lo + 3;
v.e.write_cr_data(hi downto lo) := newcrf;
end loop;
else
-- trap instructions (tw, twi, td, tdi)
if or (trapval and insn_to(e_in.insn)) = '1' then
-- generate trap-type program interrupt
exception := '1';
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#700#, 64));
ctrl_tmp.srr1 <= msr_copy(ctrl.msr);
-- set bit 46 to say trap occurred
ctrl_tmp.srr1(63 - 46) <= '1';
report "trap";
end if;
end if;
end if;
when OP_AND | OP_OR | OP_XOR | OP_POPCNT | OP_PRTY | OP_CMPB | OP_EXTS =>
result := logical_result;
result_en := '1';
when OP_B =>
is_branch := '1';
taken_branch := '1';
abs_branch := insn_aa(e_in.insn);
when OP_BC =>
-- read_data1 is CTR
bo := insn_bo(e_in.insn);
bi := insn_bi(e_in.insn);
if bo(4-2) = '0' then
result := std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(a_in) - 1);
result_en := '1';
v.e.write_reg := fast_spr_num(SPR_CTR);
end if;
is_branch := '1';
taken_branch := ppc_bc_taken(bo, bi, e_in.cr, a_in);
abs_branch := insn_aa(e_in.insn);
when OP_BCREG =>
-- read_data1 is CTR
-- read_data2 is target register (CTR, LR or TAR)
bo := insn_bo(e_in.insn);
bi := insn_bi(e_in.insn);
if bo(4-2) = '0' and e_in.insn(10) = '0' then
result := std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(a_in) - 1);
result_en := '1';
v.e.write_reg := fast_spr_num(SPR_CTR);
end if;
if ppc_bc_taken(bo, bi, e_in.cr, a_in) = '1' then
f_out.redirect <= '1';
f_out.redirect_nia <= b_in(63 downto 2) & "00";
end if;
when OP_RFID =>
f_out.redirect <= '1';
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
f_out.virt_mode <= b_in(MSR_IR) or b_in(MSR_PR);
f_out.priv_mode <= not b_in(MSR_PR);
f_out.redirect_nia <= a_in(63 downto 2) & "00"; -- srr0
-- Can't use msr_copy here because the partial function MSR
-- bits should be left unchanged, not zeroed.
ctrl_tmp.msr(63 downto 31) <= b_in(63 downto 31);
ctrl_tmp.msr(26 downto 22) <= b_in(26 downto 22);
ctrl_tmp.msr(15 downto 0) <= b_in(15 downto 0);
if b_in(MSR_PR) = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_EE) <= '1';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_IR) <= '1';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_DR) <= '1';
end if;
when OP_CNTZ =>
v.e.valid := '0';
v.cntz_in_progress := '1';
v.busy := '1';
when OP_ISEL =>
crbit := to_integer(unsigned(insn_bc(e_in.insn)));
if e_in.cr(31-crbit) = '1' then
result := a_in;
else
result := b_in;
end if;
result_en := '1';
when OP_CROP =>
cr_op := insn_cr(e_in.insn);
report "CR OP " & to_hstring(cr_op);
if cr_op(0) = '0' then -- MCRF
bf := insn_bf(e_in.insn);
bfa := insn_bfa(e_in.insn);
v.e.write_cr_enable := '1';
crnum := to_integer(unsigned(bf));
scrnum := to_integer(unsigned(bfa));
v.e.write_cr_mask := num_to_fxm(crnum);
for i in 0 to 7 loop
lo := (7-i)*4;
hi := lo + 3;
if i = scrnum then
newcrf := e_in.cr(hi downto lo);
end if;
end loop;
for i in 0 to 7 loop
lo := i*4;
hi := lo + 3;
v.e.write_cr_data(hi downto lo) := newcrf;
end loop;
else
v.e.write_cr_enable := '1';
bt := insn_bt(e_in.insn);
ba := insn_ba(e_in.insn);
bb := insn_bb(e_in.insn);
btnum := 31 - to_integer(unsigned(bt));
banum := 31 - to_integer(unsigned(ba));
bbnum := 31 - to_integer(unsigned(bb));
-- Bits 5-8 of cr_op give the truth table of the requested
-- logical operation
cr_operands := e_in.cr(banum) & e_in.cr(bbnum);
crresult := cr_op(5 + to_integer(unsigned(cr_operands)));
v.e.write_cr_mask := num_to_fxm((31-btnum) / 4);
for i in 0 to 31 loop
if i = btnum then
v.e.write_cr_data(i) := crresult;
else
v.e.write_cr_data(i) := e_in.cr(i);
end if;
end loop;
end if;
when OP_MFMSR =>
result := ctrl.msr;
result_en := '1';
when OP_MFSPR =>
report "MFSPR to SPR " & integer'image(decode_spr_num(e_in.insn)) &
"=" & to_hstring(a_in);
result_en := '1';
if is_fast_spr(e_in.read_reg1) then
result := a_in;
if decode_spr_num(e_in.insn) = SPR_XER then
-- bits 0:31 and 35:43 are treated as reserved and return 0s when read using mfxer
result(63 downto 32) := (others => '0');
result(63-32) := v.e.xerc.so;
result(63-33) := v.e.xerc.ov;
result(63-34) := v.e.xerc.ca;
result(63-35 downto 63-43) := "000000000";
result(63-44) := v.e.xerc.ov32;
result(63-45) := v.e.xerc.ca32;
end if;
else
spr_val := c_in;
case decode_spr_num(e_in.insn) is
when SPR_TB =>
spr_val := ctrl.tb;
when SPR_DEC =>
spr_val := ctrl.dec;
when 724 => -- LOG_ADDR SPR
spr_val := log_wr_addr & r.log_addr_spr;
when 725 => -- LOG_DATA SPR
spr_val := log_rd_data;
v.log_addr_spr := std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(r.log_addr_spr) + 1);
when others =>
-- mfspr from unimplemented SPRs should be a nop in
-- supervisor mode and a program interrupt for user mode
if ctrl.msr(MSR_PR) = '1' then
illegal := '1';
end if;
end case;
result := spr_val;
end if;
when OP_MFCR =>
if e_in.insn(20) = '0' then
-- mfcr
result := x"00000000" & e_in.cr;
else
-- mfocrf
crnum := fxm_to_num(insn_fxm(e_in.insn));
result := (others => '0');
for i in 0 to 7 loop
lo := (7-i)*4;
hi := lo + 3;
if crnum = i then
result(hi downto lo) := e_in.cr(hi downto lo);
end if;
end loop;
end if;
result_en := '1';
when OP_MTCRF =>
v.e.write_cr_enable := '1';
if e_in.insn(20) = '0' then
-- mtcrf
v.e.write_cr_mask := insn_fxm(e_in.insn);
else
-- mtocrf: We require one hot priority encoding here
crnum := fxm_to_num(insn_fxm(e_in.insn));
v.e.write_cr_mask := num_to_fxm(crnum);
end if;
v.e.write_cr_data := c_in(31 downto 0);
when OP_MTMSRD =>
if e_in.insn(16) = '1' then
-- just update EE and RI
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_EE) <= c_in(MSR_EE);
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_RI) <= c_in(MSR_RI);
else
-- Architecture says to leave out bits 3 (HV), 51 (ME)
-- and 63 (LE) (IBM bit numbering)
ctrl_tmp.msr(63 downto 61) <= c_in(63 downto 61);
ctrl_tmp.msr(59 downto 13) <= c_in(59 downto 13);
ctrl_tmp.msr(11 downto 1) <= c_in(11 downto 1);
if c_in(MSR_PR) = '1' then
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_EE) <= '1';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_IR) <= '1';
ctrl_tmp.msr(MSR_DR) <= '1';
end if;
end if;
when OP_MTSPR =>
report "MTSPR to SPR " & integer'image(decode_spr_num(e_in.insn)) &
"=" & to_hstring(c_in);
if is_fast_spr(e_in.write_reg) then
result := c_in;
result_en := '1';
if decode_spr_num(e_in.insn) = SPR_XER then
v.e.xerc.so := c_in(63-32);
v.e.xerc.ov := c_in(63-33);
v.e.xerc.ca := c_in(63-34);
v.e.xerc.ov32 := c_in(63-44);
v.e.xerc.ca32 := c_in(63-45);
v.e.write_xerc_enable := '1';
end if;
else
-- slow spr
case decode_spr_num(e_in.insn) is
when SPR_DEC =>
ctrl_tmp.dec <= c_in;
when 724 => -- LOG_ADDR SPR
v.log_addr_spr := c_in(31 downto 0);
when others =>
-- mtspr to unimplemented SPRs should be a nop in
-- supervisor mode and a program interrupt for user mode
if ctrl.msr(MSR_PR) = '1' then
illegal := '1';
end if;
end case;
end if;
when OP_RLC | OP_RLCL | OP_RLCR | OP_SHL | OP_SHR | OP_EXTSWSLI =>
result := rotator_result;
if e_in.output_carry = '1' then
Add basic XER support The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of the other XER fields. This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32). The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits. We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to) and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't yet implement them). To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div) are running single issue for now. One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value, thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value. I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute. Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx. [paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of arguments to set_ov] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
set_carry(v.e, rotator_carry, rotator_carry);
end if;
result_en := '1';
when OP_ISYNC =>
f_out.redirect <= '1';
f_out.redirect_nia <= next_nia;
when OP_ICBI =>
icache_inval <= '1';
when OP_MUL_L64 | OP_MUL_H64 | OP_MUL_H32 =>
v.e.valid := '0';
v.mul_in_progress := '1';
v.busy := '1';
x_to_multiply.valid <= '1';
when OP_DIV | OP_DIVE | OP_MOD =>
v.e.valid := '0';
v.div_in_progress := '1';
v.busy := '1';
x_to_divider.valid <= '1';
when others =>
v.terminate := '1';
report "illegal";
end case;
v.e.rc := e_in.rc and valid_in;
-- Mispredicted branches cause a redirect
if is_branch = '1' and taken_branch /= e_in.br_pred then
f_out.redirect <= '1';
if taken_branch = '1' then
if abs_branch = '1' then
f_out.redirect_nia <= b_in;
else
f_out.redirect_nia <= std_ulogic_vector(signed(e_in.nia) + signed(b_in));
end if;
else
f_out.redirect_nia <= next_nia;
end if;
end if;
-- Update LR on the next cycle after a branch link
-- If we're not writing back anything else, we can write back LR
-- this cycle, otherwise we take an extra cycle. We use the
-- exc_write path since next_nia is written through that path
-- in other places.
if e_in.lr = '1' then
if result_en = '0' then
v.e.exc_write_enable := '1';
v.e.exc_write_data := next_nia;
v.e.exc_write_reg := fast_spr_num(SPR_LR);
else
v.lr_update := '1';
v.next_lr := next_nia;
v.e.valid := '0';
report "Delayed LR update to " & to_hstring(next_nia);
v.busy := '1';
end if;
end if;
elsif valid_in = '1' then
-- instruction for other units, i.e. LDST
if e_in.unit = LDST then
lv.valid := '1';
end if;
elsif r.lr_update = '1' then
v.e.exc_write_enable := '1';
v.e.exc_write_data := r.next_lr;
v.e.exc_write_reg := fast_spr_num(SPR_LR);
v.e.valid := '1';
elsif r.cntz_in_progress = '1' then
-- cnt[lt]z always takes two cycles
result := countzero_result;
result_en := '1';
v.e.write_reg := gpr_to_gspr(v.slow_op_dest);
v.e.rc := v.slow_op_rc;
v.e.xerc := v.slow_op_xerc;
v.e.valid := '1';
elsif r.mul_in_progress = '1' or r.div_in_progress = '1' then
if (r.mul_in_progress = '1' and multiply_to_x.valid = '1') or
(r.div_in_progress = '1' and divider_to_x.valid = '1') then
if r.mul_in_progress = '1' then
overflow := '0';
case r.slow_op_insn is
when OP_MUL_H32 =>
result := multiply_to_x.result(63 downto 32) &
multiply_to_x.result(63 downto 32);
when OP_MUL_H64 =>
result := multiply_to_x.result(127 downto 64);
when others =>
-- i.e. OP_MUL_L64
result := multiply_to_x.result(63 downto 0);
overflow := multiply_to_x.overflow;
end case;
else
result := divider_to_x.write_reg_data;
overflow := divider_to_x.overflow;
end if;
result_en := '1';
v.e.write_reg := gpr_to_gspr(v.slow_op_dest);
v.e.rc := v.slow_op_rc;
v.e.xerc := v.slow_op_xerc;
v.e.write_xerc_enable := v.slow_op_oe;
-- We must test oe because the RC update code in writeback
-- will use the xerc value to set CR0:SO so we must not clobber
-- xerc if OE wasn't set.
if v.slow_op_oe = '1' then
v.e.xerc.ov := overflow;
v.e.xerc.ov32 := overflow;
v.e.xerc.so := v.slow_op_xerc.so or overflow;
end if;
v.e.valid := '1';
else
v.busy := '1';
v.mul_in_progress := r.mul_in_progress;
v.div_in_progress := r.div_in_progress;
end if;
end if;
if illegal = '1' then
exception := '1';
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#700#, 64));
ctrl_tmp.srr1 <= msr_copy(ctrl.msr);
-- Since we aren't doing Hypervisor emulation assist (0xe40) we
-- set bit 44 to indicate we have an illegal
ctrl_tmp.srr1(63 - 44) <= '1';
report "illegal";
end if;
if exception = '1' then
v.e.exc_write_enable := '1';
if exception_nextpc = '1' then
v.e.exc_write_data := next_nia;
end if;
ctrl_tmp.irq_state <= WRITE_SRR1;
v.busy := '1';
v.e.valid := '0';
end if;
v.e.write_data := result;
v.e.write_enable := result_en;
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
-- generate DSI or DSegI for load/store exceptions
-- or ISI or ISegI for instruction fetch exceptions
if l_in.exception = '1' then
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
ctrl_tmp.srr1 <= msr_copy(ctrl.msr);
if l_in.instr_fault = '0' then
if l_in.segment_fault = '0' then
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#300#, 64));
else
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#380#, 64));
end if;
else
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
if l_in.segment_fault = '0' then
ctrl_tmp.srr1(63 - 33) <= l_in.invalid;
ctrl_tmp.srr1(63 - 35) <= l_in.perm_error; -- noexec fault
ctrl_tmp.srr1(63 - 44) <= l_in.badtree;
ctrl_tmp.srr1(63 - 45) <= l_in.rc_error;
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#400#, 64));
else
ctrl_tmp.irq_nia <= std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(16#480#, 64));
end if;
end if;
v.e.exc_write_enable := '1';
v.e.exc_write_reg := fast_spr_num(SPR_SRR0);
v.e.exc_write_data := r.last_nia;
report "ldst exception writing srr0=" & to_hstring(r.last_nia);
ctrl_tmp.irq_state <= WRITE_SRR1;
end if;
-- Outputs to loadstore1 (async)
lv.op := e_in.insn_type;
Add TLB to icache This adds a direct-mapped TLB to the icache, with 64 entries by default. Execute1 now sends a "virt_mode" signal from MSR[IR] to fetch1 along with redirects to indicate whether instruction addresses should be translated through the TLB, and fetch1 sends that on to icache. Similarly a "priv_mode" signal is sent to indicate the privilege mode for instruction fetches. This means that changes to MSR[IR] or MSR[PR] don't take effect until the next redirect, meaning an isync, rfid, branch, etc. The icache uses a hash of the effective address (i.e. next instruction address) to index the TLB. The hash is an XOR of three fields of the address; with a 64-entry TLB, the fields are bits 12--17, 18--23 and 24--29 of the address. TLB invalidations simply invalidate the indexed TLB entry without checking the contents. If the icache detects a TLB miss with virt_mode=1, it will send a fetch_failed indication through fetch2 to decode1, which will turn it into a special OP_FETCH_FAILED opcode with unit=LDST. That will get sent down to loadstore1 which will currently just raise a Instruction Storage Interrupt (0x400) exception. One bit in the PTE obtained from the TLB is used to check whether an instruction access is allowed -- the privilege bit (bit 3). If bit 3 is 1 and priv_mode=0, then a fetch_failed indication is sent down to fetch2 and to decode1, which generates an OP_FETCH_FAILED. Any PTEs with PTE bit 0 (EAA[3]) clear or bit 8 (R) clear should not be put into the iTLB since such PTEs would not allow execution by any context. Tlbie operations get sent from mmu to icache over a new connection. Unfortunately the privileged instruction tests are broken for now. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
lv.nia := e_in.nia;
lv.addr1 := a_in;
lv.addr2 := b_in;
lv.data := c_in;
lv.write_reg := gspr_to_gpr(e_in.write_reg);
lv.length := e_in.data_len;
lv.byte_reverse := e_in.byte_reverse;
lv.sign_extend := e_in.sign_extend;
lv.update := e_in.update;
lv.update_reg := gspr_to_gpr(e_in.read_reg1);
lv.xerc := v.e.xerc;
lv.reserve := e_in.reserve;
lv.rc := e_in.rc;
lv.insn := e_in.insn;
-- decode l*cix and st*cix instructions here
if e_in.insn(31 downto 26) = "011111" and e_in.insn(10 downto 9) = "11" and
e_in.insn(5 downto 1) = "10101" then
lv.ci := '1';
end if;
dcache: Implement data TLB This adds a TLB to dcache, providing the ability to translate addresses for loads and stores. No protection mechanism has been implemented yet. The MSR_DR bit controls whether addresses are translated through the TLB. The TLB is a fixed-pagesize, set-associative cache. Currently the page size is 4kB and the TLB is 2-way set associative with 64 entries per set. This implements the tlbie instruction. RB bits 10 and 11 control whether the whole TLB is invalidated (if either bit is 1) or just a single entry corresponding to the effective page number in bits 12-63 of RB. As an extension until we get a hardware page table walk, a tlbie instruction with RB bits 9-11 set to 001 will load an entry into the TLB. The TLB entry value is in RS in the format of a radix PTE. Currently there is no proper handling of TLB misses. The load or store will not be performed but no interrupt is generated. In order to make timing at 100MHz on the Arty A7-100, we compare the real address from each way of the TLB with the tag from each way of the cache in parallel (requiring # TLB ways * # cache ways comparators). Then the result is selected based on which way hit in the TLB. That avoids a timing path going through the TLB EA comparators, the multiplexer that selects the RA, and the cache tag comparators. The hack where addresses of the form 0xc------- are marked as cache-inhibited is kept for now but restricted to real-mode accesses. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
lv.virt_mode := ctrl.msr(MSR_DR);
lv.priv_mode := not ctrl.msr(MSR_PR);
-- Update registers
rin <= v;
-- update outputs
--f_out <= r.f;
l_out <= lv;
e_out <= r.e;
flush_out <= f_out.redirect;
exception_log <= exception;
irq_valid_log <= irq_valid;
end process;
ex1_log : process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
log_data <= ctrl.msr(MSR_EE) & ctrl.msr(MSR_PR) &
ctrl.msr(MSR_IR) & ctrl.msr(MSR_DR) &
exception_log &
irq_valid_log &
std_ulogic_vector(to_unsigned(irq_state_t'pos(ctrl.irq_state), 1)) &
"000" &
r.e.write_enable &
r.e.valid &
f_out.redirect &
r.busy &
flush_out;
end if;
end process;
log_out <= log_data;
end architecture behaviour;